Vexatious Litigant
3 cases · August 2025 to March 2026
Case Volume by Year
1 25
2 26
2025–2026
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
There are 2 High Court Orders and 2 Federal Government Gazettes declaring the Plaintiff a vexatious litigant. The Plaintiff has not challenged the High Court Orders or the Federal Government Gazettes. Is it necessary for the Plaintiff to obtain leave from a High Court Judge before filing this Originating Summons (“OS”)? Did the Plaintiff obtain this leave? If no leave was obtained before filing the OS, should the OS be struck out under Order 18 rule 19(1)(b) and/or Order 18 rule 19(1)(d) of the Rules of Courts 2012 for want of leave? 1 There are 2 High Court Orders and 2 Federal Government Gazettes declaring the Plaintiff a vexatious litigant. The Plaintiff has not challenged the High Court Orders or the Federal Government Gazettes. Is it necessary for the Plaintiff to obtain leave from a High Court Judge before filing this Originating Summons (“OS”)? Did the Plaintiff obtain this leave? If no leave was obtained before filing the OS, should the OS be struck out under Order 18 rule 19(1)(b) and/or Order 18 rule 19(1)(d) of the Rules of Courts 2012 for want of leave? Should consequential orders be made against the Plaintiff? 1 Courts of Judicature Act 1964 — Paragraph 17 Schedule CJA 1964 — Abuse of Process — Habitual and Persistent Legal Proceedings — Without Reasonable Cause — Undischarged Bankrupt — Insolvency Act 1967 — Section 38(1)(a) Insolvency Act — Sanction of Director General of Insolvency (DGI Sanction) — Charged Land — Chargee’s Rights — Foreclosure Suit — Restraining Order. 1
There are 2 High Court Orders and 2 Federal Government Gazettes declaring the Plaintiff a vexatious litigant. The Plaintiff has not challenged the High Court Orders or the Federal Government Gazettes. Is it necessary for the Plaintiff to obtain leave from a High Court Judge before filing this Originating Summons (“OS”)? Did the Plaintiff obtain this leave? If no leave was obtained before filing the OS, should the OS be struck out under Order 18 rule 19(1)(b) and/or Order 18 rule 19(1)(d) of the Rules of Courts 2012 for want of leave? 1 case
There are 2 High Court Orders and 2 Federal Government Gazettes declaring the Plaintiff a vexatious litigant. The Plaintiff has not challenged the High Court Orders or the Federal Government Gazettes. Is it necessary for the Plaintiff to obtain leave from a High Court Judge before filing this Originating Summons (“OS”)? Did the Plaintiff obtain this leave? If no leave was obtained before filing the OS, should the OS be struck out under Order 18 rule 19(1)(b) and/or Order 18 rule 19(1)(d) of the Rules of Courts 2012 for want of leave? Should consequential orders be made against the Plaintiff? 1 case
Courts of Judicature Act 1964 — Paragraph 17 Schedule CJA 1964 — Abuse of Process — Habitual and Persistent Legal Proceedings — Without Reasonable Cause — Undischarged Bankrupt — Insolvency Act 1967 — Section 38(1)(a) Insolvency Act — Sanction of Director General of Insolvency (DGI Sanction) — Charged Land — Chargee’s Rights — Foreclosure Suit — Restraining Order. 1 case
Key Statutes
Courts of Judicature Act 1964 (Cap 91)
cited in 3 cases Rules of Court 2012
cited in 2 cases Penal Code (Cap 574)
cited in 1 case National Land Code (Cap 828)
cited in 1 case Court Distribution
Key People & Firms
Cases
ba-24ncvc-2928-12-2025
KOK KON SANG v LEE TZE JIUN
29 March 2026
MYHC
ba-24ncvc-2958-12-2025
KOK KON SANG v 1. ) TANJUNG ATLANTIK SDN BHD 2. ) EDMUND CHOI SING EU/GAN.HO & RAZLAN HADRI PIHAK TERKILAN Public Bank Berhad
29 March 2026
MYHC
ka-24ncvc-94-03-2025
CIMB BANK BERHAD v THIYAGARAJAN A/L MPL YEGAPPAN
27 August 2025
MYHC