KOK KON SANG v 1. ) TANJUNG ATLANTIK SDN BHD 2. ) EDMUND CHOI SING EU/GAN.HO & RAZLAN HADRI PIHAK TERKILAN Public Bank Berhad

ba-24ncvc-2958-12-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 29 March 2026 • BA-24NCvC-2958-12/2025 • 16 min read

12 cases cited (3 SG, 9 foreign)

Catchwords

Vexatious litigant – There are 2 High Court Orders and 2 Federal Government Gazettes declaring the Plaintiff a vexatious litigant. The Plaintiff has not challenged the High Court Orders or the Federal Government Gazettes. Is it necessary for the Plaintiff to obtain leave from a High Court Judge before filing this Originating Summons (“OS”)? Did the Plaintiff obtain this leave? If no leave was obtained before filing the OS, should the OS be struck out under Order 18 rule 19(1)(b) and/or Order 18 rule 19(1)(d) of the Rules of Courts 2012 for want of leave? Should consequential orders be made against the Plaintiff?

Judges (1)

Helmi bin Hamzah Delivered

Counsel (3)

Gan, Ho & Razlan Hadri Firm Edmund Choi Sing Counsel Defendant Razlan Hadri Zulkifli Counsel Defendant

Parties (4)

PUBLIC BANK BERHAD Aggrieved Party TANJUNG ATLANTIK Sdn Bhd Respondent Edmund Choi Sing Eu/gan.ho & Razlan Hadri Respondent Kok Kon Sang Applicant

Statutes Cited

Courts of Judicature Act 1964 (Cap 91)

National Land Code (Cap 828)

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (12)

SLR (3)

[1990] 1 SLR 1251 [2003] 2 SLR 491 [2005] 2 SLR 188

UK (1)

[1965] 1 QB 232

MY (8)

[1988] 2 MLJ 12 [1993] 3 MLJ 36 [2009] 5 CLJ 101 [2013] 3 MLJ 235 [2013] 3 MLJ 511 [2019] 12 MLJ 1 [2024] 8 MLJ 101 [2025] MLJU 954

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-24ncvc-2958-12-2025)