Judicial Review
44 cases · February 2024 to July 2026
Case Volume by Year
8 24
18 25
18 26
2024–2026
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Public service disciplinary proceedings — Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) — Respondents dismissed following various charges of misconduct — High Court quashed dismissal on the ground of failure to provide reasons for decision — Whether Disciplinary Authority (DB) has a statutory or constitutional duty to provide reasons for its decision — Whether dismissal affected right to livelihood under Article 5(1) of the Federal Constitution — Proper scope of Article 135(2) of the Federal Constitution in public service dismissals — Distinction between judicial review of public service disciplinary bodies and private employment disputes under the Industrial Court — Per incuriam doctrine — High Court’s reliance on Nazrul Imran bin Mohd Nor v Civil Service Commission Malaysia & Anor [2021] 6 MLJ 750 — Whether Nazrul Imran was decided per incuriam — Whether there was a fundamental procedural defect or irregularity in the decision-making process. Fundamental liberties — Right to life and livelihood — Article 5(1) of the Federal Constitution — Whether public officers have a constitutional right to remain in public service — Tenure of office during the pleasure of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong — Article 132(2A) of the Federal Constitution — Dismissal or reduction in rank — Safeguard of reasonable opportunity to be heard — Article 135(2) of the Federal Constitution — Whether Article 135(2) requires an oral hearing or the provision of reasons for a decision — Relationship between Article 5(1) and Article 135(2) in disciplinary matters. Conduct and Discipline — Public Officers (Conduct and Discipline) Regulations 1993 — Regulation 37 — Disciplinary procedure for dismissal or reduction in rank — Compliance with prescribed procedures — Whether a disciplinary authority must explain why an officer's representation failed to exculpate them — Evaluation of evidence and determination of punishment as the exclusive province of the disciplinary authority — Limits of judicial intervention in public service disciplinary cases. "Holds office during the pleasure of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong" — Article 132(2A) Federal Constitution. 3 Order 53 rule 3(6) Rules of Court 2012 — Time limit — When grounds first arose — Objective test — Knowledge of operative contractual effect — Later discovery of administrative letter — Failure to seek extension — Jurisdictional bar 2 Consistent application of limitation — Distinction between contractual incorporation and subsequent administrative decision — Different factual matrices — Application of same legal test 2 Prejudice — Whether absence of hearing causes real prejudice — Foreseeable objection — No actionable unfairness 2 Discretionary relief — Certiorari — Refusal despite alleged defect — Completed transactions — Third-party reliance — Stability of housing arrangements 2 Military law — Court-martial — Convening authority — Whether convening officer possessed requisite command power — Temporary attachment of accused to Legal Branch — Whether accused was “under command” within meaning of s 104(4) Armed Forces Act 1972 — Delegation of power — Whether lack of command renders proceedings void ab initio — Effect of jurisdictional defect — Armed Forces Act 1972, s 104 — Federal Constitution, arts 5(1), 8(1), 137(1). 2 Scope — Military tribunals — Distinction between appeal and review — Whether High Court may re-evaluate evidence — Exceptional circumstances — Jurisdictional error and breach of natural justice — Discretionary relief. 2 dismissal without just cause or excuse — representations were referred to the Industrial Court pursuant to s.20(3) of the Act. . 2 Mining licence — Renewal of prospecting licence — Refusal by State Authority — Judicial review of licensing decision — Whether decision illegal, irrational or procedurally improper — Whether renewal under s 43 of Kelantan Mineral Enactment 2001 discretionary — Whether court may interfere with exercise of statutory discretion. 1 Leave application — Interdiction order — University professor charged with criminal breach of trust — Statutory university disciplinary committee ordering interdiction pending disposal of criminal charge — Reduction of emoluments to one-half — Whether respondents public authorities amenable to judicial review — Whether applicant person adversely affected — Whether arguable case disclosed — Order 53 r 3 Rules of Court 2012. 1 Leave — Threshold test — Arguable case — Point fit for further investigation — Court not concerned with merits at leave stage — Whether application frivolous or vexatious. 1 Leave application — Threshold for leave — Whether applicant established arguable case fit for full investigation — Scope of court’s function at leave stage — Whether application frivolous — Rules of Court 2012, O 53 r 3(1) 1 Strata Management Tribunal — Default award — Application to quash tribunal awards — Whether tribunal acted in breach of natural justice — Whether Borang 1 initiating claim properly served — Whether presumption of service displaced where AR registered post returned to sender — Interpretation Acts 1948 and 1967, s 12 1 Stay of execution — Tribunal awards — Whether special circumstances shown — Prima facie error of law — Risk of judicial review rendered nugatory — Existence of overlapping appellate proceedings — Whether stay pending disposal of judicial review should be granted 1 Leave Application — Order 53 rule 3(1) Rules of Court 2012 — Threshold for leave — Arguable case — Whether application frivolous or hopeless — WRP Asia Pacific Sdn Bhd v Tenaga Nasional Berhad [2012] 4 MLJ 296 (Federal Court) — QSR Brands Bhd v Suruhanjaya Sekuriti & Anor [2006] 3 MLJ 164 (Court of Appeal) Strata Management — Joint Management Body — Annual General Meeting — Motion by parcel proprietor — Paragraph 13(1) and 13(2) Second Schedule Strata Management Act 2013 — Whether JMC has discretion to refuse inclusion of motion in AGM agenda — Mandatory statutory duty — “Sub judice” refusal — Whether Tribunal arguably erred in law Statutory Interpretation — Meaning of “next general meeting” — Whether literal interpretation produces absurdity — Presumption against absurd construction — Interaction between statutory notice mechanism and AGM agenda process Judicial Review — Amenability — Strata Management Tribunal — Section 120 Strata Management Act 2013 — Supervisory jurisdiction of High Court preserved notwithstanding finality clause Judicial Review — Stay Pending Disposal — Order 53 rule 3(5) Rules of Court 2012 — Limited stay of costs order granted Injunction — Ex parte injunction — Order 29 rule 1(2C) Rules of Court 2012 — Statutory prohibition against ex parte injunction restraining meeting of body corporate — Whether Court may restrain AGM ex parte — 16th AGM of Joint Management Body — Relief refused Procedural Fairness — Tribunal written grounds — Section 117 Strata Management Act 2013 — Whether withholding written grounds until leave granted raises arguable public law issue Civil Procedure — Liberty to amend grounds upon receipt of Tribunal grounds — Costs reserved to substantive hearing 1 Order 53 rule 3(6) Rules of Court 2012 — Time limit — When grounds first arose — Objective test — Knowledge of operative contractual effect — Later discovery of administrative letter — Failure to seek extension — Jurisdictional bar. 1 Consistent application of limitation — Distinction between contractual incorporation and subsequent administrative decision — Different factual matrices — Application of same legal test. 1 Prejudice — Whether absence of hearing causes real prejudice — Foreseeable objection — No actionable unfairness. 1 Discretionary relief — Certiorari — Refusal despite alleged defect — Completed transactions — Third-party reliance — Stability of housing arrangements. 1 Leave application — Merchant Shipping Ordinance 1952 — Second detention order against vessel — Investigative powers — Amenability to judicial review — Mala fide — Abuse of power — Functus officio — Double jeopardy — Articles 5, 7(2) and 8 Federal Constitution — Procedural impropriety — Whether second detention after payment of fine founded on same factual substratum lawful — Whether issues raised arguable and non-frivolous — Leave granted under O 53 r 3 ROC 2012 — Costs reserved 1
+ 32 more
Order 53 rule 3(6) Rules of Court 2012 — Time limit — When grounds first arose — Objective test — Knowledge of operative contractual effect — Later discovery of administrative letter — Failure to seek extension — Jurisdictional bar 2 cases
ma-25-7-07-2024 1. ) CHEW YU XIANG 2. ) CHEW FUI KINN 3. ) CHEW MEOW CHEN 4. ) GOH HOCK THUAN 5. ) CHEW FUPENG 6. ) GOH WEI JIE 7. ) NUR ATIKAH BINTI ROSLI 8. ) JUSTIN ONG KHENG YANG 9. ) NG THENG EE 10. ) ROBENDRAN A/L PUCHANDRAN 11. ) ARIF QUSYAIRI BIN BUSTAMI 12. ) ALICIA TENG HUI CHING 13. ) AZLAN SHAH BIN MOHAMED AMALI 14. ) HARZIRA BINTI HARUN 15. ) LIM CHUIN RONG 16. ) SENG LOO CHIN 17. ) ONG KIEN GHEE 18. ) TAN GEOK YEONG 19. ) JUMARI BIN KASMIN 20. ) MOHAMAD FAIZAL BIN ABDULLAH 21. ) TEA WEE LONG 22...
27 April 2026
ma-25-9-08-2024 1. ) GAN MAY PING 2. ) MUHAMMAD SAFUAN BIN SETH 3. ) CHIA KOK HOONG 4. ) SOH ENG GEOK 5. ) KONG KAH SOON 6. ) LIAW LIN LEE 7. ) TEOH CHOON HEA 8. ) SIEW HUEY MING 9. ) CHAN WEY SHEN 10. ) NURJANNAH ZAIHA BINTI HAMZAH 11. ) GOH SEE JAU 12. ) WAHIDANOOR BT WAHID 13. ) TAY CHAU HWEE 14. ) ARNIE SHAZLEEN BINTI ABDUL RAHMAN 15. ) MARINA TAN BINTI MOHD ROSS TAN 16. ) LEE ENG KIAT 17. ) LEE KOK HENG 18. ) CHONG KAH WEI 19. ) LIM HON YOONG 20. ) TAN PING 21. ) LEE YOONG SING 22. ) LEE CHONG HWAI 23. ...
27 April 2026
Consistent application of limitation — Distinction between contractual incorporation and subsequent administrative decision — Different factual matrices — Application of same legal test 2 cases
ma-25-7-07-2024 1. ) CHEW YU XIANG 2. ) CHEW FUI KINN 3. ) CHEW MEOW CHEN 4. ) GOH HOCK THUAN 5. ) CHEW FUPENG 6. ) GOH WEI JIE 7. ) NUR ATIKAH BINTI ROSLI 8. ) JUSTIN ONG KHENG YANG 9. ) NG THENG EE 10. ) ROBENDRAN A/L PUCHANDRAN 11. ) ARIF QUSYAIRI BIN BUSTAMI 12. ) ALICIA TENG HUI CHING 13. ) AZLAN SHAH BIN MOHAMED AMALI 14. ) HARZIRA BINTI HARUN 15. ) LIM CHUIN RONG 16. ) SENG LOO CHIN 17. ) ONG KIEN GHEE 18. ) TAN GEOK YEONG 19. ) JUMARI BIN KASMIN 20. ) MOHAMAD FAIZAL BIN ABDULLAH 21. ) TEA WEE LONG 22...
27 April 2026
ma-25-9-08-2024 1. ) GAN MAY PING 2. ) MUHAMMAD SAFUAN BIN SETH 3. ) CHIA KOK HOONG 4. ) SOH ENG GEOK 5. ) KONG KAH SOON 6. ) LIAW LIN LEE 7. ) TEOH CHOON HEA 8. ) SIEW HUEY MING 9. ) CHAN WEY SHEN 10. ) NURJANNAH ZAIHA BINTI HAMZAH 11. ) GOH SEE JAU 12. ) WAHIDANOOR BT WAHID 13. ) TAY CHAU HWEE 14. ) ARNIE SHAZLEEN BINTI ABDUL RAHMAN 15. ) MARINA TAN BINTI MOHD ROSS TAN 16. ) LEE ENG KIAT 17. ) LEE KOK HENG 18. ) CHONG KAH WEI 19. ) LIM HON YOONG 20. ) TAN PING 21. ) LEE YOONG SING 22. ) LEE CHONG HWAI 23. ...
27 April 2026
Prejudice — Whether absence of hearing causes real prejudice — Foreseeable objection — No actionable unfairness 2 cases
ma-25-7-07-2024 1. ) CHEW YU XIANG 2. ) CHEW FUI KINN 3. ) CHEW MEOW CHEN 4. ) GOH HOCK THUAN 5. ) CHEW FUPENG 6. ) GOH WEI JIE 7. ) NUR ATIKAH BINTI ROSLI 8. ) JUSTIN ONG KHENG YANG 9. ) NG THENG EE 10. ) ROBENDRAN A/L PUCHANDRAN 11. ) ARIF QUSYAIRI BIN BUSTAMI 12. ) ALICIA TENG HUI CHING 13. ) AZLAN SHAH BIN MOHAMED AMALI 14. ) HARZIRA BINTI HARUN 15. ) LIM CHUIN RONG 16. ) SENG LOO CHIN 17. ) ONG KIEN GHEE 18. ) TAN GEOK YEONG 19. ) JUMARI BIN KASMIN 20. ) MOHAMAD FAIZAL BIN ABDULLAH 21. ) TEA WEE LONG 22...
27 April 2026
ma-25-9-08-2024 1. ) GAN MAY PING 2. ) MUHAMMAD SAFUAN BIN SETH 3. ) CHIA KOK HOONG 4. ) SOH ENG GEOK 5. ) KONG KAH SOON 6. ) LIAW LIN LEE 7. ) TEOH CHOON HEA 8. ) SIEW HUEY MING 9. ) CHAN WEY SHEN 10. ) NURJANNAH ZAIHA BINTI HAMZAH 11. ) GOH SEE JAU 12. ) WAHIDANOOR BT WAHID 13. ) TAY CHAU HWEE 14. ) ARNIE SHAZLEEN BINTI ABDUL RAHMAN 15. ) MARINA TAN BINTI MOHD ROSS TAN 16. ) LEE ENG KIAT 17. ) LEE KOK HENG 18. ) CHONG KAH WEI 19. ) LIM HON YOONG 20. ) TAN PING 21. ) LEE YOONG SING 22. ) LEE CHONG HWAI 23. ...
27 April 2026
Discretionary relief — Certiorari — Refusal despite alleged defect — Completed transactions — Third-party reliance — Stability of housing arrangements 2 cases
ma-25-7-07-2024 1. ) CHEW YU XIANG 2. ) CHEW FUI KINN 3. ) CHEW MEOW CHEN 4. ) GOH HOCK THUAN 5. ) CHEW FUPENG 6. ) GOH WEI JIE 7. ) NUR ATIKAH BINTI ROSLI 8. ) JUSTIN ONG KHENG YANG 9. ) NG THENG EE 10. ) ROBENDRAN A/L PUCHANDRAN 11. ) ARIF QUSYAIRI BIN BUSTAMI 12. ) ALICIA TENG HUI CHING 13. ) AZLAN SHAH BIN MOHAMED AMALI 14. ) HARZIRA BINTI HARUN 15. ) LIM CHUIN RONG 16. ) SENG LOO CHIN 17. ) ONG KIEN GHEE 18. ) TAN GEOK YEONG 19. ) JUMARI BIN KASMIN 20. ) MOHAMAD FAIZAL BIN ABDULLAH 21. ) TEA WEE LONG 22...
27 April 2026
ma-25-9-08-2024 1. ) GAN MAY PING 2. ) MUHAMMAD SAFUAN BIN SETH 3. ) CHIA KOK HOONG 4. ) SOH ENG GEOK 5. ) KONG KAH SOON 6. ) LIAW LIN LEE 7. ) TEOH CHOON HEA 8. ) SIEW HUEY MING 9. ) CHAN WEY SHEN 10. ) NURJANNAH ZAIHA BINTI HAMZAH 11. ) GOH SEE JAU 12. ) WAHIDANOOR BT WAHID 13. ) TAY CHAU HWEE 14. ) ARNIE SHAZLEEN BINTI ABDUL RAHMAN 15. ) MARINA TAN BINTI MOHD ROSS TAN 16. ) LEE ENG KIAT 17. ) LEE KOK HENG 18. ) CHONG KAH WEI 19. ) LIM HON YOONG 20. ) TAN PING 21. ) LEE YOONG SING 22. ) LEE CHONG HWAI 23. ...
27 April 2026
Scope — Military tribunals — Distinction between appeal and review — Whether High Court may re-evaluate evidence — Exceptional circumstances — Jurisdictional error and breach of natural justice — Discretionary relief. 2 cases
ta-25-3-12-2024 MUHAMAD ZULZAMRI BIN HARUN v 1. ) LEFTENAN KOLONEL MOHD FAEZAL BIN MAHAMAD TUDM, YANG DIPERTUA MAHKAMAH TENTERA 2. ) BRIGEDIER JENERAL DR. NORAZRIN BIN SHAMSUDIN TUDM, PEGAWAI SIDANG MAHKAMAH TENTERA/PEGAWAI PENGESAH 3. ) TIMBALAN PANGLIMA TENTERA UDARA LEFTENAN JENERAL DATO’ HAJI MUHAMAD NORAZLAN BIN ARIS 4. ) MAJLIS ANGKATAN TENTERA 5. ) Kerajaan Malaysia
25 November 2025
ta-25-4-12-2024 NORISAM BIN ABDULLAH v 1. ) LEFTENAN KOLONEL MOHD FAEZAL BIN MAHAMAD TUDM, YANG DIPERTUA MAHKAMAH TENTERA 2. ) BRIGEDIER JENERAL DR. NORAZRIN BIN SHAMSUDIN TUDM, PEGAWAI SIDANG MAHKAMAH TENTERA/PEGAWAI PENGESAH 3. ) TIMBALAN PANGLIMA TENTERA UDARA LEFTENAN JENERAL DATO’ HAJI MUHAMAD NORAZLAN BIN ARIS 4. ) MAJLIS ANGKATAN TENTERA 5. ) Kerajaan Malaysia
25 November 2025
dismissal without just cause or excuse — representations were referred to the Industrial Court pursuant to s.20(3) of the Act. . 2 cases
w-01a-128-03-2021 Hubline Berhad v 1. ) Danny Ng Hean Tee & 20 Orang Lagi 2. ) MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN MALAYSIA 3. ) Highline Shipping Sdn Bhd
20 October 2025
w-01a-142-03-2021 HIGHLINE SHIPPING SDN BHD v 1. ) INTAN WAZLIN BINTI AB WAHAB 2. ) DANNY NG HEAN TEE 3. ) TAI KUANG NENG 4. ) RUZI BIN SUPERMAN 5. ) NORMIZAH BINTI JAMIAN 6. ) WAN BAIZURAH BINTI WAN HUSIN 7. ) VICRAN A/L ELANGGOVEN 8. ) MOHD HAFILDZ BIN ASHA'ARI 9. ) NORA AZILIDA BINTI MAMAT 10. ) RADZIAH BINTI MOHD OMAR 11. ) GEORGE MASILAMONEY 12. ) ANNAMAL GIRIJA 13. ) VISWASEGAR A/L RASIAH 14. ) MOHD FAUZI BIN SALEH 15. ) SHAHRUL ANUAR BIN MAT ZAIN 16. ) SUHANA BINTI MOHD ZUBIR 17. ) HASLIZA BINTI ZAKARIA...
20 October 2025
Leave — Threshold test — Arguable case — Point fit for further investigation — Court not concerned with merits at leave stage — Whether application frivolous or vexatious. 1 case
Leave application — Threshold for leave — Whether applicant established arguable case fit for full investigation — Scope of court’s function at leave stage — Whether application frivolous — Rules of Court 2012, O 53 r 3(1) 1 case
Strata Management Tribunal — Default award — Application to quash tribunal awards — Whether tribunal acted in breach of natural justice — Whether Borang 1 initiating claim properly served — Whether presumption of service displaced where AR registered post returned to sender — Interpretation Acts 1948 and 1967, s 12 1 case
Stay of execution — Tribunal awards — Whether special circumstances shown — Prima facie error of law — Risk of judicial review rendered nugatory — Existence of overlapping appellate proceedings — Whether stay pending disposal of judicial review should be granted 1 case
Leave Application — Order 53 rule 3(1) Rules of Court 2012 — Threshold for leave — Arguable case — Whether application frivolous or hopeless — WRP Asia Pacific Sdn Bhd v Tenaga Nasional Berhad [2012] 4 MLJ 296 (Federal Court) — QSR Brands Bhd v Suruhanjaya Sekuriti & Anor [2006] 3 MLJ 164 (Court of Appeal) Strata Management — Joint Management Body — Annual General Meeting — Motion by parcel proprietor — Paragraph 13(1) and 13(2) Second Schedule Strata Management Act 2013 — Whether JMC has discretion to refuse inclusion of motion in AGM agenda — Mandatory statutory duty — “Sub judice” refusal — Whether Tribunal arguably erred in law Statutory Interpretation — Meaning of “next general meeting” — Whether literal interpretation produces absurdity — Presumption against absurd construction — Interaction between statutory notice mechanism and AGM agenda process Judicial Review — Amenability — Strata Management Tribunal — Section 120 Strata Management Act 2013 — Supervisory jurisdiction of High Court preserved notwithstanding finality clause Judicial Review — Stay Pending Disposal — Order 53 rule 3(5) Rules of Court 2012 — Limited stay of costs order granted Injunction — Ex parte injunction — Order 29 rule 1(2C) Rules of Court 2012 — Statutory prohibition against ex parte injunction restraining meeting of body corporate — Whether Court may restrain AGM ex parte — 16th AGM of Joint Management Body — Relief refused Procedural Fairness — Tribunal written grounds — Section 117 Strata Management Act 2013 — Whether withholding written grounds until leave granted raises arguable public law issue Civil Procedure — Liberty to amend grounds upon receipt of Tribunal grounds — Costs reserved to substantive hearing 1 case
Order 53 rule 3(6) Rules of Court 2012 — Time limit — When grounds first arose — Objective test — Knowledge of operative contractual effect — Later discovery of administrative letter — Failure to seek extension — Jurisdictional bar. 1 case
Consistent application of limitation — Distinction between contractual incorporation and subsequent administrative decision — Different factual matrices — Application of same legal test. 1 case
Prejudice — Whether absence of hearing causes real prejudice — Foreseeable objection — No actionable unfairness. 1 case
Discretionary relief — Certiorari — Refusal despite alleged defect — Completed transactions — Third-party reliance — Stability of housing arrangements. 1 case
Leave application — Merchant Shipping Ordinance 1952 — Second detention order against vessel — Investigative powers — Amenability to judicial review — Mala fide — Abuse of power — Functus officio — Double jeopardy — Articles 5, 7(2) and 8 Federal Constitution — Procedural impropriety — Whether second detention after payment of fine founded on same factual substratum lawful — Whether issues raised arguable and non-frivolous — Leave granted under O 53 r 3 ROC 2012 — Costs reserved 1 case
Appeal against decision of HCJ in upholding the Industrial Court’s finding that retrenchment of Appellant was justified — Whether First Respondent (employer) had proved genuine financial hardship to justify retrenchment of Appellant — Whether financial hardship of parent company of First Respondent could be attributable to First Respondent 1 case
Appeal against decision of HCJ in upholding the Industrial Court’s finding that retrenchment of Appellant was justified — Whether High Court Judge had erred in holding that departure from the “Last In, First Out” principle was justified — Whether First Respondent was justified in relying on “Best-Fit” rule 1 case
Appeal against decision of HCJ in upholding the Industrial Court’s finding that retrenchment of Appellant was justified — Whether High Court Judge had erred in holding that non-compliance with the Code of Conduct for Industrial Harmony 1975 was justified — Whether Code of Conduct for Industrial Harmony had binding force of law . 1 case
Leave stage — Order 53 r 3 Rules of Court 2012 — Arguable case — Amenability to judicial review — Decision, refusal, omission or operative administrative position — Ripeness — Prematurity — Public law element — 1 case
challenge the validity of a Planning Permission dated 28.1.2023 (“the Planning Permission”) granted by the 2nd Respondent, Majlis Bandaraya Kuantan for the construction and development of a Permanent Disposal Facility (“PDF”) for Water Leach Purification (“WLP”) waste on a land known as Lot 31375, Gebeng Industrial Estate, Mukim Sungai Karang, Kuantan, Pahang — sections 20B(1)(b)(ii), 22(2A)(b), and or 22(4) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1976 — Kuantan Local Plan 2035 (Replacement) — Whether Appellant Has Locus Standi — Whether JR Application Filed Within Time — Should Extension of Time Be Granted — Discretionary Reliefs 1 case
Order 53 Rules of Court 1 case
orders of certiorari — granted to quash the decision of MDT for reconsideration in accordance with law, after affording the Applicant a proper opportunity 1 case
whether the Respondents’ failure to disclose the detailed methodology and figures underpinning the dumping margin prior to the Final Determination was lawful, and whether the use of erroneous figures in the margin calculation renders the determination invalid. — Countervailing and Anti-Dumping Duties Regulations 1994 ("CADDR 1994") — principles of procedural fairness and natural Justice — Duty to Disclose Detailed Dumping Margin Calculation Sheet — Procedural Impropriety 1 case
Key Statutes
Rules of Court 2012
cited in 11 cases Federal Constitution
cited in 10 cases Industrial Relations Act 1967 (Cap 177)
cited in 4 cases Pensions Ordinance
cited in 3 cases Civil Law Act
cited in 3 cases Courts of Judicature Act 1964 (Cap 91)
cited in 2 cases Court of Judicature Act 1964
cited in 2 cases Supreme Court of Judicature Act
cited in 2 cases Income Tax Act 1967 (Cap 53)
cited in 2 cases Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 593)
cited in 1 case Penal Code (Cap 574)
cited in 1 case Communications and Multimedia Act 1998
cited in 1 case Kelantan Mineral Enactment 2001
cited in 1 case Mineral Enactment
cited in 1 case Mineral Enactment 2001
cited in 1 case Court Distribution
Key People & Firms
Top Judges
Raja Segaran a/l S.krishnan 7 Ahmad Kamal bin Md. Shahid 6 Azmi bin Ariffin 6 Azizah binti Haji Nawawi 4 S. Nantha Balan a/l E.s. Moorthy 3 Ong Chee Kwan 3 Quay Chew Soon 3 Azizul Azmi bin Adnan 3 Hasnah binti Dato' Mohammed Hashim 2 Hanipah binti Farikullah 2 Zabariah binti Mohd Yusof 2 Bhupindar Singh a/l Gurcharan Singh Preet 2 Mohd Firuz bin Jaffril 2 Yusrin Faidz bin Yusoff 2 Noorin binti Badaruddin 2
Top Firms
Jabatan Peguam Negara 5 Attorney General's Chambers 3 Sreekant Pillai 3 Shafee & Co. 2 Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri 2 Shearn Delamore & Co. 2 Robert Low & Ooi 2 Muhendaran Sri 2 Louis Ambrose & Partners 2 Perak Legal Advisor Offices 1 Akram Hizri, Azad & Azmir 1 Rosli Dahlan Saravana Partnership 1 Izzat Muhtar & Hasra 1 Lim Chee Wee Partnership 1 Norendra & Yap 1
Top Lawyers
Mohammad Sallehuddin Bin Md Ali 3 Sreekant Pillai 3 Shamsul Bin Bolhassan 2 Tan Sri Dato' Mohd Dusuki bin Mokhtar 2 Ahmad Hanir bin Hambaly @ Arwi 2 Nurhafizza bt Azizan 2 Safiyyah binti Omar 2 Ainna Sherina binti Saipolamin 2 Siti Nurfarhana Muhammad Azmi 2 Tan Sri Dr. Muhammad Shafee bin Abdullah 2 Muhammad Farhan bin Muhammad Shafee 2 Wan Muhammad Arfan bin Wan Othman 2 Nur Syafiqah binti Mohd Sofian 2 Naresh a/l Mayachandran 2 Tharrence Anthony 2
Cases
Page 2 of 2b-01a-666-12-2023
MULTI-PURPOSE CREDIT SDN BHD v KETUA PENGARAH LEMBAGA HASIL DALAM NEGERI
22 September 2025
MYCOA
01i-12-05-2025w
PEGUAM NEGARA MALAYSIA v DATO' SRI MOHD NAJIB BIN TUN HJ ABD RAZAK
12 August 2025
MYFC
01i-13-05-2025w
PEGUAM NEGARA MALAYSIA v DATO' SRI MOHD NAJIB BIN TUN HJ ABD RAZAK
12 August 2025
MYFC
pa-25-60-11-2024
Molex (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v 1. ) MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN MALAYSIA 2. ) Kon Siang Boon
28 July 2025
MYHC
w-01im-562-10-2023
1. ) SHASHI KUMAR A/L SHANMUGAM 2. ) NG KIM HO 3. ) BOBBY ANAK WILLIAM 4. ) CHAN TUCK LOONG 5. ) SRI RAMESH A/L V.KANNAN v 1. ) KETUA POLIS NEGARA, MALAYSIA 2. ) Peguam Negara Malaysia
9 July 2025
MYCOA
pa-25-63-12-2024
1. ) RAMANI A/P VISVANATHAN 2. ) S. GANESAN AA/L SAMIAH v 1. ) DR. FAWZIAH BT TAN SRI DATO' ISHAK 2. ) MAJLIS PERUBATAN MALAYSIA
18 May 2025
MYHC
w-01a-574-10-2023
XTREME MERIDIAN SDN BHD v 1. ) TRIBUNAL TUNTUTAN PEMBELI RUMAH 2. ) Muhammad Hariz Bin Md Azman
21 April 2025
MYCOA
aa-25-10-04-2024
MOHD FIRDAUS BIN JAHAYA v 1. ) JABATAN AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI PERAK 2. ) PENGERUSI LEMBAGA TATATERTIB PERKHIDMATAN AWAM NEGERI PERAK BAGI KUMPULAN SOKONGAN NO. 1 3. ) LEMBAGA RAYUAN TATATERTIB PERKHIDMATAN AWAM 4. ) Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Awam Malaysia 5. ) Kerajaan Negeri Perak
14 April 2025
MYHC
pa-25-53-10-2024
1. ) LIM BOON LIN 2. ) CHIAN NGOOK FOR 3. ) LIM HOCK GEE 4. ) CHEN KWAN SOON 5. ) GOH TEONG HOE 6. ) TEH KWENG SEONG 7. ) TAN GHEE HONG 8. ) TAN HONG CHOON 9. ) LIM HUCK HENG 10. ) JERRICK LIM HUCK CHOR 11. ) NG YOKE YOU v 1. ) MAJLIS BANDARAYA PULAU PINANG 2. ) PENANG HAN CHIANG ASSOCIATED CHINESE SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION 3. ) Tan Sri Dato' Seri Tan Kok Ping 4. ) Dato' Seri Ooi Soo Hing 5. ) ALM ARCHITECTS ( Disaman Sebagai Firma Perkongsian)
7 April 2025
MYHC
aa-25-17-06-2021
CHA POH ONN v 1. ) TASEK CORPORATION BERHAD 2. ) MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN MALAYSIA
18 March 2025
MYHC
pa-25-1-01-2024
RAKAN SETIA HOUSING SDN. BHD. v 1. ) MOHD AZRIZAL BIN ROSLI 2. ) TRIBUNAL TUNTUTAN PEMBELI RUMAH
9 February 2025
MYHC
w-01a-623-10-2021
1. ) MENTERI KEWANGAN 2. ) KEMENTERIAN KEWANGAN MALAYSIA 3. ) MENTERI PERDAGANGAN ANTARABANGSA DAN INDUSTRI 4. ) KEMENTERIAN PERDAGANGAN ANTARABANGSA DAN INDUSTRI 5. ) KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN KASTAM DIRAJA MALAYSIA 6. ) Jabatan Kastam Diraja Malaysia (KDRM) 7. ) Kerajaan Malaysia v NATSTEEL HOLDINGS PTE LIMITED
2 December 2024
MYCOA
wa-25-250-08-2023
LOO CHEE CHOU v INSTITUT AKAUNTAN MALAYSIA
28 October 2024
MYHC
wa-25-140-05-2023
ELAINE LEONG EE LING v 1. ) PENDAFTAR BESAR WARGANEGARA 2. ) MENTERI DALAM NEGERI MALAYSIA 3. ) Kerajaan Malaysia
16 September 2024
MYHC
wa-25-181-07-2023
1. ) TAN KIM HWA 2. ) XXXX v 1. ) PENDAFTAR BESAR WARGANEGARA MALAYSIA 2. ) MENTERI DALAM NEGERI MALAYSIA 3. ) Kerajaan Malaysia
16 September 2024
MYHC
wa-25-190-07-2023
PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN HATTEN SQUARE LOT 1348 v 1. ) TRIBUNAL PENGURUSAN STRATA PUTRAJAYA, WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN 2. ) BRICKWORKS REALTY SDN BHD
23 June 2024
MYHC
wa-25-88-02-2020
MOHAMED AMINUDEEN BIN ABDUL HAMID v 1. ) MENTERI KEWANGAN MALAYSIA 2. ) BANK NEGARA MALAYSIA 3. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 4. ) Resolution Alliance Sdn. Bhd 5. ) Malayan Banking Berhad
5 May 2024
MYHC
w-01a-449-08-2021
Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri v GENTING MALAYSIA BERHAD
28 April 2024
MYCOA
aa-25-17-09-2020
TAI LAI MUN v 1. ) HEINEKEN MALAYSIA BERHAD/HEINEKEN MARKETING MALAYSIA SDN.BHD. 2. ) MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN MALAYSIA
5 February 2024
MYHC