MOHD FIRDAUS BIN JAHAYA v 1. ) JABATAN AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI PERAK 2. ) PENGERUSI LEMBAGA TATATERTIB PERKHIDMATAN AWAM NEGERI PERAK BAGI KUMPULAN SOKONGAN NO. 1 3. ) LEMBAGA RAYUAN TATATERTIB PERKHIDMATAN AWAM 4. ) Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Awam Malaysia 5. ) Kerajaan Negeri Perak

aa-25-10-04-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 14 April 2025 • AA-25-10-04/2024 • 11 min read
16 cases cited (0 SG, 16 foreign)

Catchwords

Judicial Review – Public employment – Dismissal – Failure to give contemporaneous reasons – Procedural unfairness – Right to meaningful judicial review – Whether silence in statute excuses duty to give reasons – Disciplinary jurisdiction – Whether public service rules applicable to conduct committed before entry into public service – Whether State authority acted ultra vires – Remedies limited to reinstatement and back pay is appropriate relief to cure procedural irregularity

Judges (1)

Moses Susayan Delivered

Counsel (5)

Akram Hizri, Azad & Azmir Firm Perak Legal Advisor Offices Firm Mohd Fitri bin Sadarudin Counsel Respondent Noorazmir bin Zakaria Counsel Applicant Siti Farah Farhana Ahmad Fathi Counsel Applicant

Parties (6)

JABATAN AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI PERAK Respondent Kerajaan Negeri Perak Respondent LEMBAGA RAYUAN TATATERTIB PERKHIDMATAN AWAM Respondent PENGERUSI LEMBAGA TATATERTIB PERKHIDMATAN AWAM NEGERI PERAK BAGI KUMPULAN SOKONGAN NO. 1 Respondent SURUHANJAYA PERKHIDMATAN AWAM MALAYSIA Respondent Mohd Firdaus bin Jahaya Applicant

Case Significance

MOHD FIRDAUS BIN JAHAYA v 1. ) JABATAN AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI PERAK 2. ) PENGERUS... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated April 14, 2025 (citation: aa-25-10-04-2024). The case was decided by Moses Susayan.

What was the outcome of MOHD FIRDAUS BIN JAHAYA v 1. ) JABATAN AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI PERAK 2. ) PENGERUS...?

MOHD FIRDAUS BIN JAHAYA v 1. ) JABATAN AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI PERAK 2. ) PENGERUS... is a High Court decision dated April 14, 2025. The case was heard by Moses Susayan. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Federal Constitution

Cases Cited (16)

UK (2)
[1989] 1 WLR 525 [1991] 2 All ER 10
MY (14)
[1989] 1 MLJ 487 [1990] 1 CLJ 44 [1999] 3 MLJ 1 [2016] 2 MLJ 495 [2016] 5 CLJ 250 [2016] AMEJ 0895 [2017] 10 CLJ 36 [2017] 4 CLJ 265 [2017] 6 MLJ 586 [2018] 2 MLJ 590 [2021] 10 CLJ 737 [2021] 2 CLJ 808 [2021] 3 MLJ 1 [2021] 6 MLJ 750

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (aa-25-10-04-2024)