KUALA DIMENSI SDN BHD v PORT KELANG AUTHORITY

02f-7-04-2024b Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) 1 September 2024 • 02(f)-7-04/2024(B) • 54 min read
26 cases cited (1 SG, 25 foreign)

Catchwords

Judges (3)

Counsel (8)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

KUALA DIMENSI SDN BHD v PORT KELANG AUTHORITY is a Federal Court (Mahkamah Persekutuan) decision dated September 1, 2024 (citation: 02f-7-04-2024b). <p>Kuala Dimensi appealed against the Court of Appeal's decision declaring a variation agreement with Port Kelang Authority null and void for want of consideration under section 26 of the Contracts Act 1950. The Federal Court examined whether the practical benefit test from Williams v Roffey Bros applies in Malaysia and whether parties can vary consideration by mutual agreement. The appeal was dismissed and the Court of Appeal's decision was affirmed, declining to answer the leave questions dire The panel comprised Abdul Karim bin Abdul Jalil, Hasnah binti Dato' Mohammed Hashim and Zabariah binti Mohd Yusof, with Zabariah binti Mohd Yusof delivering the judgment. Counsel appearing: Craig Ho Wai Ping (counsel for appellant), Dato' Prem Ramachandran (counsel for appellant), Nimalan Devaraja (counsel for respondent), Porres P. Royan (counsel for appellant), Shaarvin Raaj a/l Selva Kumar (counsel for appellant), Wong Shun Yong (counsel for respondent).

Summary

Kuala Dimensi appealed against the Court of Appeal's decision declaring a variation agreement with Port Kelang Authority null and void for want of consideration under section 26 of the Contracts Act 1950. The Federal Court examined whether the practical benefit test from Williams v Roffey Bros applies in Malaysia and whether parties can vary consideration by mutual agreement. The appeal was dismissed and the Court of Appeal's decision was affirmed, declining to answer the leave questions directly.

What was the outcome of KUALA DIMENSI SDN BHD v PORT KELANG AUTHORITY?

<p>Kuala Dimensi appealed against the Court of Appeal's decision declaring a variation agreement with Port Kelang Authority null and void for want of ...

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (26)

SLR (1)
[2008] 3 SLR 1029
UK (5)
[1877] 2 AC 439 [1914] AC 132 [1981] 3 All ER 189 [1982] QB 84 [1991] 1 QB 1
AU (1)
[2015] NSWSC 810
MY (19)
[1967] 2 MLJ 9 [1970] 2 MLJ 165 [1972] 2 MLJ 62 [1979] 1 MLJ 129 [1979] 2 MLJ 229 [1984] 1 MLJ 222 [1984] 2 MLJ 290 [1987] 2 MLJ 52 [1988] 3 MLJ 352 [1991] 1 MLJ 221 [1995] 3 MLJ 331 [2001] 1 MLJ 324 [2004] 7 MLJ 513 [2007] 6 MLJ 65 [2014] 11 MLJ 175 [2016] 5 MLJ 1 [2023] 3 MLJ 829 [2023] MLJU 986 [2024] 2 MLJ 362

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (02f-7-04-2024b)