XXXX v XXXX

22ip-43-11-2013 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 16 April 2026 • 22IP-43-11/2013 • 39 min read

22 cases cited (1 SG, 21 foreign)

Catchwords

CIVIL PROCEDURE —Proceedings— Committal Proceedings — Leave for committal proceeding granted against the defendants — Whether the defendants have breached the injunctive orders granted on 14 January 2015 — Whether the Defendants' conduct interfered with the administration of justice — Whether the element of intention must be established — Whether the imposition of a fine would be fair and proportionate — Whether a custodial sentence is warranted in the circumstances — application allowed with costs on an indemnity basis — Order 52 Rules of Court 2012

Judges (1)

Edwin Paramjothy a/l Michael Muniandy Delivered

Counsel (7)

Skrine Firm Wong & Partners Firm Chew Kherk Ying Counsel Defendant Gooi Yang Shuh Counsel Plaintiff Joshua Teoh Beni Chris Counsel Plaintiff Raymond Tan Counsel Defendant Valerie Chung Shu En Counsel Plaintiff

Statutes Cited

Patents Act 1983 (Cap 291)

s 62

Cases Cited (22)

SLR (1)

[2021] 5 SLR 1428

UK (2)

[1991] 1 All ER 911 [2010] EWHC 2843

MY (19)

[1977] 1 MLJ 151 [1987] 1 MLJ 206 [1997] 3 MLJ 240 [1999] 4 MLJ 321 [1999] 8 CLJ 614 [2001] 4 MLJ 577 [2002] 4 MLJ 241 [2008] 8 CLJ 308 [2009] 9 MLJ 441 [2012] 2 CLJ 849 [2012] MLJU 640 [2016] 6 MLJ 670 [2018] MLJU 1981 [2019] 4 MLJ 747 [2019] MLJU 994 [2021] 2 MLJ 652 [2023] 1 MLJ 705 [2023] 8 MLJ 488 [2024] 1 MLJ 936

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (22ip-43-11-2013)