3 TWO SQUARE SDN BHD v 1. ) PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN 3 TWO SQUARE 2. ) YONG SHANG MING 3. ) XXXX 4. ) Ir Yap Yee Hock
4 cases cited
(0 SG, 4 foreign)
Catchwords
Introduction 1. The Plaintiff applied under Order 52 Rule 2 and 4 of the Rules of Court 2012 (“the Rules”) to cite the Defendants for contempt of paragraph 1 and 2 of a High Court Judgment dated 22/6/2017. 2. The Plaintiff had obtained a mandatory injunction at the High Court against the Defendants for the management and maintenance of the property referred to as 3 Two Square. Conclusion 20. Based on the factors above the Court dismissed the Plaintiff’s application for contempt against the Defendants with a cost of RM10,000.
Judges (1)
Counsel (11)
Chambers of Firdaus Firm Mah Weng Kwai & Associates Firm Abraham Au Tian Hui Counsel Plaintiff Aqil Nasharuddin Counsel Plaintiff Daphne Rethual Counsel Plaintiff Dato' Dr Gurdial Singh Nijar Counsel Plaintiff David Samuel Counsel Defendant John Chan Chia Yoong Counsel Plaintiff Raymond Mah Mun Kitt Counsel Plaintiff Sheena Sebastian Counsel Defendant Tharani Kunasekara Counsel Plaintiff
Cases Cited (4)
MY (4)
[1993] 3 CLJ 210 [2012] 3 MLJ 458 [2015] 4 CLJ 113 [2021] 2 MLJ 652
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (22ncvc-586-10-2013)