MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD v 1. ) Vida Beauty Sdn Bhd 2. ) Hasmiza Binti Othman

aa-22m-24-12-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 17 September 2025 • AA-22M-24-12/2022 • 2 min read

Catchwords

Tatacara Sivil – Penghakiman Ingkar Kehadiran – Permohonan untuk mengetepikan Penghakiman – Kelewatan menfailkan permohonan – Sama ada kelewatan dijelaskan secara memuaskan – Samada Penghakiman diperoleh secara teratur – Penyampaian mengikut kontrak melalui pos berdaftar prabayar – Penyampaian dianggap sempurna (deemed service) – Aturan 10 k.3, Aturan 42 k.13 dan Aturan 92 k.4 Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 – Sama ada wujud pembelaan bermerit – Perbankan Islam – Pembiayaan Komoditi Murabahah – Klausa percepatan – Hak menuntut Harga Jualan Bank sepenuhnya selepas default – Sama ada tuntutan pra-matang – Ibra’ – Rebat keuntungan belum diperoleh – Sama ada ibra’ terpakai hanya dalam penyelesaian awal dan bukan dalam situasi keingkaran – Jaminan – Hak pemiutang menuntut penjamin tanpa perlu merealisasikan cagaran terlebih dahulu

Judges (1)

Norsharidah binti Awang Delivered

Parties (3)

MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD Plaintiff Vida Beauty Sdn Bhd Defendant Hasmiza binti Othman Defendant

Case Significance

MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD v 1. ) Vida Beauty Sdn Bhd 2. ) Hasmiza Binti Othman is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 17, 2025 (citation: aa-22m-24-12-2022). The case was decided by Norsharidah binti Awang.

What was the outcome of MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD v 1. ) Vida Beauty Sdn Bhd 2. ) Hasmiza Binti Othman?

MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD v 1. ) Vida Beauty Sdn Bhd 2. ) Hasmiza Binti Othman is a High Court decision dated September 17, 2025. The case was heard by Norsharidah binti Awang. See the full judgment for details.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (aa-22m-24-12-2022)