1. ) GANESAN A/L NARAYANASAMY 2. ) KALIAMAH A/P PERUMAL v 1. ) KASTURI A/P MOHANADAS 2. ) SAKTHIVEL NAGALINGAM 3. ) JOSEPH A/L SEBESTIAN 4. ) TETUAN AMRAN JOSEPH, CHAN & CO 5. ) SATHIAKUMAR A/L SELVANATHAN

aa-22ncvc-84-10-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 2 March 2026 • AA-22NCvC-84-10/2025 • 14 min read
23 cases cited (0 SG, 23 foreign)

Catchwords

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Striking out – Application to strike out writ and statement of claim – Alleged non compliance with Order 72 rule 7 of Rules of Court 2012 – Failure to issue citation before commencing writ to revoke grant of probate – Whether application under Order 18 rule 19(1)(d) sustainable without supporting affidavit – Whether statement of claim disclosed reasonable cause of action based on pleaded facts of fraud – Whether citation subsequently filed cured procedural lapse – Whether non compliance constituted technical irregularity under Order 2 rule 1 of Rules of Court 2012 – Whether real prejudice or miscarriage of justice shown – Whether dispute should be determined on substantive merits in light of overriding interest of justice under Order 1A

Judges (1)

Moses Susayan Delivered

Counsel (5)

Loh Velu & Partners Firm Manjeet Kaur & Co. Firm Manjeet Kaur Counsel Defendant Sakthivel Nagalingam Counsel Defendant Vilassini Nynasekaran Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (7)

TETUAN AMRAN JOSEPH, CHAN & CO Defendant Ganesan a/l Narayanasamy Plaintiff Joseph a/l Sebestian Defendant Kaliamah a/p Perumal Plaintiff Kasturi a/p Mohanadas Defendant Sakthivel Nagalingam Defendant Sathiakumar a/l Selvanathan Defendant

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (23)

MY (23)
[2002] 1 AMR 1089 [2002] 1 CLJ 645 [2002] 1 MLJ 385 [2002] 1 MLRH 490 [2002] 3 CLJ 686 [2002] 4 AMR 4462 [2002] 6 MLJ 134 [2003] 3 CLJ 532 [2003] 3 MLJ 321 [2003] 4 AMR 421 [2007] 5 AMR 269 [2007] 5 CLJ 290 [2007] 5 MLJ 756 [2010] 1 MLJ 656 [2010] 1 MLRH 350 [2010] 4 MLJ 842 [2010] 6 CLJ 593 [2010] 6 CLJ 954 [2017] 5 MLJ 35 [2019] MLJU 946 [2020] 3 CLJ 353 [2023] 6 MLRH 549 [2023] MLJU 2016

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (aa-22ncvc-84-10-2025)