1. ) MUHAMMAD RASIDI BIN MAZLAN 2. ) SALAHUDIN BIN MAZLAN v AHMAD KHAIRUL AMIN BIN AHMAD KHIR JOHARI

ba-11b-46-12-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 16 July 2025 • BA-11B-46-12/2024 • 21 min read
18 cases cited (0 SG, 18 foreign)

Catchwords

UNDANG-UNDANG TORT: Kemalangan jalan raya – Rayuan mengenai isu liabiliti dan kuantum – Dapatan Mahkamah Rendah diakaskan pada peringkat rayuan di Mahkamah Tinggi − Agihan liabiliti ialah 60:40 – Sama ada dapatan dan keputusan Mahkamah Rendah adalah khilaf – Sama ada Responden/plaintif cuai sumbang – Isu Kuantum mengenai Ganti rugi Khas kos rawatan Responden/plaintif di hospital swasta − Sama ada prinsip stare decisis terpakai − Prinsip “appellate intervention on the plainly wrong test”.

Judges (1)

Rozi binti Bainon Delivered

Counsel (4)

Kenneth William & Associates Firm Ranizan Abdullah & Associates Firm Kunalan A/L Seevalingam Counsel Appellant Muhamad Iqbal bin Ismail Counsel Respondent

Parties (3)

Ahmad Khairul Amin bin Ahmad Khir Johari Respondent Muhammad Rasidi bin Mazlan Appellant Salahudin bin Mazlan Appellant

Case Significance

1. ) MUHAMMAD RASIDI BIN MAZLAN 2. ) SALAHUDIN BIN MAZLAN v AHMAD KHAIRUL AMI... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated July 16, 2025 (citation: ba-11b-46-12-2024). The case was decided by Rozi binti Bainon.

What was the outcome of 1. ) MUHAMMAD RASIDI BIN MAZLAN 2. ) SALAHUDIN BIN MAZLAN v AHMAD KHAIRUL AMI...?

1. ) MUHAMMAD RASIDI BIN MAZLAN 2. ) SALAHUDIN BIN MAZLAN v AHMAD KHAIRUL AMI... is a High Court decision dated July 16, 2025. The case was heard by Rozi binti Bainon. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (18)

MY (18)
[1966] 1 MLJ 188 [1978] 1 MLJ 61 [1990] 2 CLJ 191 [1993] 2 CLJ 146 [1995] 3 CLJ 378 [1999] 2 AMR 1884 [2000] 4 MLJ 433 [2001] 1 AMR 599 [2003] 2 MLJ 97 [2005] 2 CLJ 195 [2005] 2 MLJ 1 [2005] 2 MLJ 679 [2010] 9 MLJ 448 [2015] 6 CLJ 295 [2017] 1 MLJ 170 [2017] 10 CLJ 529 [2020] 10 CLJ 1 [2022] 2 CLJ 173

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-11b-46-12-2024)