SITI RAMAH MOHD NOOR v Syed Faizal Shah Bin Syed Gulzar Ali Shah

ba-11bncvc-25-09-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 5 November 2025 • BA-11BNCvC-25-09/2024 • 16 min read

8 cases cited (0 SG, 8 foreign)

Catchwords

Appeal from the Magistrate’s Court-Breach of Contract-Termination of Tenancy agreement-oral agreement-Plaintiff’s claim for balance renovation and repair costs, the refund of deposits and an overpaid water bill-Defendant’s counterclaim for balance rental, repair costs, and replacement items-appellate court to apply plainly wrong test-no appellate interference if the lower court has judicially appreciated the evidence led during trial-admissibility of ‘without prejudice’ letter- parties are bound by pleading-inconsistency oral testimony affects the credibility of the witness.

Judges (1)

Anita binti Harun Delivered

Counsel (5)

Azmi & Associates Firm Rabinder Budiman & Associates Firm Ammera binti Hadi Counsel Appellant Izzat Asyraf bin Zamri Counsel Appellant Rajwinjit Kaur Khalae a/p Ajit Singh Khalae Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

Siti Ramah Mohd Noor Appellant Syed Faizal Shah bin Syed Gulzar Ali Shah Respondent

Cases Cited (8)

MY (8)

[1971] 2 MLJ 196 [1981] 2 MLJ 17 [1990] 2 MLJ 152 [2004] 4 CLJ 309 [2010] 9 CLJ 785 [2017] 4 MLJ 791 [2020] 12 MLJ 67 [2021] 3 CLJ 159

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-11bncvc-25-09-2024)