1. ) PLOT AND PARCEL GROUP BERHAD 2. ) MOHD HAMIRUL AZAD BIN MOHD HANIFFA v RAHIMAH BINTI JAAFAR
Catchwords
By way of a Notice of Appeal dated 9 December 2024, the 1st and 2nd Appellants (who were the 2nd and 5th Defendants in the Sessions Court, respectively) appealed to this Court against the decision of the learned Sessions Court Judge dated 27 November 2024, which dismissed their applications to set aside two Judgments in Default entered against them by the Respondent (the Plaintiff in the Sessions Court) on 3 November 2022 and 30 January 2023, respectively. The appeal centres on the following three issues: • Whether the JIDs entered against the 1st and 2nd Appellants were regular or irregular; • If regular, whether the 1st and 2nd Appellants have disclosed a defence on the merits; and • Whether there was inordinate delay in applying to set aside the JIDs.
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Case Significance
1. ) PLOT AND PARCEL GROUP BERHAD 2. ) MOHD HAMIRUL AZAD BIN MOHD HANIFFA v R... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 23, 2025 (citation: ba-12a-59-12-2024). The case was decided by Choong Yeow Choy.
What was the outcome of 1. ) PLOT AND PARCEL GROUP BERHAD 2. ) MOHD HAMIRUL AZAD BIN MOHD HANIFFA v R...?
1. ) PLOT AND PARCEL GROUP BERHAD 2. ) MOHD HAMIRUL AZAD BIN MOHD HANIFFA v R... is a High Court decision dated June 23, 2025. The case was heard by Choong Yeow Choy. See the full judgment for details.
Statutes Cited
Contracts Act 1950 (Cap 136)
Rules of Court 2012
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (ba-12a-59-12-2024)