PAUL RAJ A/L DAVIS v MERCEDES-BENZ SERVICES MALAYSIA SDN. BHD.

ba-12ancc-25-11-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 18 August 2025 • BA-12ANCC-25-11/2024 • 8 min read

Catchwords

Appeal - Whether the Appellant had raised arguable and substantive issues regarding the non-compliance with the HP Act, section 4 1(b)(ii) and section 5(1) and whether the Appellant is entitled to reimbursement of the payment made under a void contract - section 4(1)(a) is applicable in this relationship between Appellant and Respondent, as the Appellant had signed the written statement in Part I of the Second Schedule as required under section 4(1)(a) of the HP Act - Appeal dismissed.

Judges (1)

Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat Delivered

Counsel (4)

Andrew Davis & Co. Firm Ling & Tan Law Chambers Firm Tan Ru En Counsel Respondent Zaitul Naziah binti Mohd Soib Counsel Appellant

Parties (2)

MERCEDES-BENZ SERVICES MALAYSIA Sdn Bhd Respondent Paul Raj a/l Davis Appellant

Case Significance

PAUL RAJ A/L DAVIS v MERCEDES-BENZ SERVICES MALAYSIA SDN. BHD. is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated August 18, 2025 (citation: ba-12ancc-25-11-2024). The case was decided by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat.

What was the outcome of PAUL RAJ A/L DAVIS v MERCEDES-BENZ SERVICES MALAYSIA SDN. BHD.?

PAUL RAJ A/L DAVIS v MERCEDES-BENZ SERVICES MALAYSIA SDN. BHD. is a High Court decision dated August 18, 2025. The case was heard by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

HP Act
s 16 s 4(1) s 4(1)(a) s 4(4) s 5(1)
Rules of Court 2012

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-12ancc-25-11-2024)