ARMANEE CONDOMINIUM JOINT MANAGEMENT BODY v BURGESS RAWSON MANAGEMENT SDN BHD

ba-12ancvc-59-11-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 21 August 2025 • BA-12ANCvC-59-11/2024 • 8 min read

1 cases cited (0 SG, 1 foreign)

Catchwords

Appeal – O14 and O18 - application for summary judgment pursuant to Order 14 of the ROC and an application for striking out under Order 18 Rule 19 involve two different sets of principles, tests and burdens of proof. The facts of the case may be similar, as may the issues arising - I am of the opinion that consideration in an application for summary judgment is different from an application to strike out under O18. Therefore, the SCJ's reason, at paragraph 13 of his GOJ, is a misdirection of the law – appeal allowed.

Judges (1)

Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat Delivered

Counsel (7)

Gavin Jajapal Firm Othman Hashim & Co Firm Gavin Jay Anand Jayapal Counsel Respondent Harvinpal Kaur Ghuman Counsel Appellant Merissa Ann Augustin Counsel Respondent Sabrina Mohamed Ameen Counsel Appellant Sivanandini Sreegantham Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

BURGESS RAWSON MANAGEMENT Sdn Bhd Respondent Armanee Condominium Joint Management Body Appellant

Case Significance

ARMANEE CONDOMINIUM JOINT MANAGEMENT BODY v BURGESS RAWSON MANAGEMENT SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated August 21, 2025 (citation: ba-12ancvc-59-11-2024). The case was decided by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat.

What was the outcome of ARMANEE CONDOMINIUM JOINT MANAGEMENT BODY v BURGESS RAWSON MANAGEMENT SDN BHD?

ARMANEE CONDOMINIUM JOINT MANAGEMENT BODY v BURGESS RAWSON MANAGEMENT SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated August 21, 2025. The case was heard by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (1)

MY (1)

[2012] 1 CLJ 75

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-12ancvc-59-11-2024)