EUM Realty Sdn Bhd v Inter Formula (M) Sdn Bhd

ba-12ancvc-77-12-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 6 May 2025 • BA-12ANCvC-77-12/2024 • 14 min read
17 cases cited (0 SG, 17 foreign)

Catchwords

This is an appeal by EUM Realty Sdn Bhd, the Third Defendant in the Sessions Court, pursuant to Order 55 rule 5 of the Rules of Court 2012, against the decision of the learned Sessions Court Judge in dismissing its application in Enclosure 19 with costs in the cause. Enclosure 19 at the Sessions Court was premised on Order 33 rule 2 and/or Order 15 rule 6 and/or Order 18 rule 19(1) of the Rules of Court 2012. The primary issue in this appeal is whether the Sessions Court had erred in law and/or in fact in dismissing the Appellant’s Notice of Application in Enclosure 19.

Judges (1)

Choong Yeow Choy Delivered

Counsel (4)

K Y Lim & Patners Firm Khabir Dhillon Firm Khabir Saroop Singh Dhillon Counsel Respondent Tee Xue Ying Counsel Appellant

Parties (2)

EUM Realty Sdn Bhd Appellant Inter Formula Sdn Bhd Respondent

Case Significance

EUM Realty Sdn Bhd v Inter Formula (M) Sdn Bhd is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated May 6, 2025 (citation: ba-12ancvc-77-12-2024). The case was decided by Choong Yeow Choy.

What was the outcome of EUM Realty Sdn Bhd v Inter Formula (M) Sdn Bhd?

EUM Realty Sdn Bhd v Inter Formula (M) Sdn Bhd is a High Court decision dated May 6, 2025. The case was heard by Choong Yeow Choy. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (17)

MY (17)
[1995] 1 AMR 622 [1995] 1 MLJ 281 [2011] 2 MLJ 1 [2013] 5 MLJ 423 [2013] 7 CLJ 37 [2016] 4 MLJ 695 [2016] 8 CLJ 623 [2016] AMEJ 1614 [2017] 8 CLJ 27 [2017] AMEJ 1985 [2018] 2 MLJ 497 [2021] AMEJ 0104 [2021] AMEJ 0983 [2021] MLJU 122 [2022] 10 MLJ 656 [2024] MLJU 3109 [2025] 2 CLJ 57

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-12ancvc-77-12-2024)