1. ) Mohd Aiman bin Halim 2. ) Abdul Khalib bin Abdullah v Muhammad Khairul Asyraf bin Abdullah

ba-12b-115-10-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 30 June 2025 • BA-12B-115-10/2024 • 8 min read

Catchwords

Appeal after full trial – Road accident – Appeal on liability and quantum of damages – Apportionment of liability – Extent of Defendant's contributory negligence – Conflicting testimonies between witnesses – Whether there is a plain error in Sessions Court’s judgment – Apportionment of liability varied to 50:50 - Whether damages awarded appropriate – No appealable error on assessment of damages – Appeal allowed in part

Judges (1)

Elaine Yap Chin Gaik Delivered

Counsel (4)

Anad & Noraini Firm Gurmit Sodhi Chambers Firm Chan Ding Chong Counsel Respondent Renessh a/l Thanabala Counsel Appellant

Parties (3)

Abdul Khalib bin Abdullah Appellant Mohd Aiman bin Halim Appellant Muhammad Khairul Asyraf bin Abdullah Respondent

Case Significance

1. ) Mohd Aiman bin Halim 2. ) Abdul Khalib bin Abdullah v Muhammad Khairul A... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 30, 2025 (citation: ba-12b-115-10-2024). The case was decided by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik.

What was the outcome of 1. ) Mohd Aiman bin Halim 2. ) Abdul Khalib bin Abdullah v Muhammad Khairul A...?

1. ) Mohd Aiman bin Halim 2. ) Abdul Khalib bin Abdullah v Muhammad Khairul A... is a High Court decision dated June 30, 2025. The case was heard by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Road Transport Act 1987

s 41

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-12b-115-10-2024)