IMPIAN SELAMA COMMUNICATION AND SERVICES SDN BHD v RAVINDRAN A/L RAJOO

ba-12b-29-03-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 24 June 2025 • BA-12B-29-03/2024 • 13 min read

12 cases cited (0 SG, 12 foreign)

Catchwords

This is an appeal by the Appellant against the decision of the learned Sessions Court Judge, who, after a full trial, dismissed the Appellant’s claim against the Respondent with costs. Sesion Court Judge did not misdirect herself in law or fact and had sufficiently evaluated the evidence. The legal burden remained on the Appellant throughout the trial, that no evidence was adduced to show that the works were not carried out, and that no prima facie case of fraud was established. The decision of the Sessions Court is upheld and affirmed.

Judges (1)

Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat Delivered

Counsel (4)

Jas Adlina & Izzal Firm R. Kengadharan & Co. Firm Jashvini A. Rajendran Counsel Defendant R Kengadharan Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

IMPIAN SELAMA COMMUNICATION AND SERVICES Sdn Bhd Appellant Ravindran a/l Rajoo Respondent

Case Significance

IMPIAN SELAMA COMMUNICATION AND SERVICES SDN BHD v RAVINDRAN A/L RAJOO is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 24, 2025 (citation: ba-12b-29-03-2024). The case was decided by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat.

What was the outcome of IMPIAN SELAMA COMMUNICATION AND SERVICES SDN BHD v RAVINDRAN A/L RAJOO?

IMPIAN SELAMA COMMUNICATION AND SERVICES SDN BHD v RAVINDRAN A/L RAJOO is a High Court decision dated June 24, 2025. The case was heard by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)

s 102 s 103

Cases Cited (12)

UK (1)

[1947] AC 484

MY (11)

[1969] 1 MLJ 236 [1980] 2 MLJ 86 [1996] 3 MLJ 627 [1996] 4 CLJ 545 [2004] 4 CLJ 309 [2005] 2 MLJ 1 [2007] 3 CLJ 281 [2010] 9 CLJ 785 [2014] 8 CLJ 451 [2015] 2 MLJ 441 [2015] 7 CLJ 584

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-12b-29-03-2024)