1. ) MOHANNA A/L RENGASAMY 2. ) THE LAW OFFICE OF MOHANNA & CO. v KRISHNA KUMAR A/L KALIANAN
43 cases cited
(0 SG, 43 foreign)
Catchwords
CIVIL PROCEDURE: Appeal- Whether appellate court should interfere with findings of fact-Whether Sessions Court Judge had erred in principle, misapprehended facts, or failed to take into consideration relevant facts in arriving at decision, thus warranting appellate interference TORT: Negligence-Professional negligence-Respondent appointed appellants as solicitors for sale and purchase of property-Transaction failed-Respondent initially claimed against vendors but lost his claim-Respondent discovered several documents prepared by appellants were inconsistent, inaccurate, and irregular-Respondent sued appellants for professional negligence-Sessions Court found in favour of Respondent-Whether Sessions Court Judge erred by not requiring expert evidence to establish applicable standard of care-Whether Sessions Court Judge had disregarded binding precedents and misapplied the law-Effect of electing no case to answer-Whether negligence was proven on balance of probabilities
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Case Significance
1. ) MOHANNA A/L RENGASAMY 2. ) THE LAW OFFICE OF MOHANNA & CO. v KRISHNA KUM... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated May 14, 2025 (citation: ba-12b-50-05-2024). The case was decided by Jamhirah binti Ali.
What was the outcome of 1. ) MOHANNA A/L RENGASAMY 2. ) THE LAW OFFICE OF MOHANNA & CO. v KRISHNA KUM...?
1. ) MOHANNA A/L RENGASAMY 2. ) THE LAW OFFICE OF MOHANNA & CO. v KRISHNA KUM... is a High Court decision dated May 14, 2025. The case was heard by Jamhirah binti Ali. See the full judgment for details.
Cases Cited (43)
UK (5)
[1935] AC 243 [1947] AC 484 [1972] AC 877 [2005] UKPC 40 [2013] 1 WLR 2477
MY (38)
[1969] 2 MLJ 209 [1969] 2 MLJ 49 [1980] 1 MLJ 4 [1981] 1 MLJ 24 [1991] 1 MLJ 33 [1995] 3 MLJ 395 [1995] 4 MLJ 673 [1996] 2 MLJ 517 [1997] 3 MLJ 693 [1997] 4 CLJ 509 [1998] 1 MLJ 697 [2008] 2 CLJ 369 [2008] 3 MLJ 81 [2009] 10 CLJ 234 [2009] 5 CLJ 200 [2010] 1 CLJ 381 [2010] 1 MLJ 284 [2013] 2 MLJ 29 [2014] 2 MLJ 449 [2014] 3 CLJ 984 [2014] AMEJ 0062 [2015] 2 CLJ 1037 [2015] 3 MLJ 609 [2016] 10 MLJ 517 [2016] 6 AMR 797 [2017] 1 MLJ 328 [2017] 1 MLJ 486 [2017] 2 CLJ 665 [2017] 3 MLJ 281 [2017] 4 CLJ 676 [2017] 4 MLJ 207 [2019] 6 MLJ 417 [2019] 7 CLJ 740 [2020] 12 MLJ 67 [2020] 3 AMR 317 [2020] 4 MLJ 380 [2020] 5 CLJ 82 [2020] 5 MLJ 549
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (ba-12b-50-05-2024)