INTAN SHAHNAZLAH BINTI ABDULLAH v MUHAMMAD NAIM BIN GHULAM MUHAMMAD

ba-12b-97-09-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 25 June 2025 • BA-12B-97-09/2024 • 13 min read

12 cases cited (0 SG, 12 foreign)

Catchwords

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Appeal – Finding of facts by Trial Judge - Whether the Sessions Court Judge had erred during trial – Whether High Court intervention is warranted – Appeal dismissed DEFAMATION: Elements of defamation – Interpretation of defamatory words – Reference of defamatory statement - Publication to third parties

Judges (1)

Jamhirah binti Ali Delivered

Counsel (6)

Abdul, Low & Partners Firm Khairul & Shuhada Firm Irman Al-Syafeeq bin Mohd Simin Counsel Appellant Khairul Anuar bin Musa Counsel Respondent Mohammad Yunus bin Razak Counsel Respondent Muhammad Izhar bin Mohd Salehuddin Counsel Appellant

Parties (2)

Intan Shahnazlah binti Abdullah Appellant Muhammad Naim bin Ghulam Muhammad Respondent

Case Significance

INTAN SHAHNAZLAH BINTI ABDULLAH v MUHAMMAD NAIM BIN GHULAM MUHAMMAD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 25, 2025 (citation: ba-12b-97-09-2024). The case was decided by Jamhirah binti Ali.

What was the outcome of INTAN SHAHNAZLAH BINTI ABDULLAH v MUHAMMAD NAIM BIN GHULAM MUHAMMAD?

INTAN SHAHNAZLAH BINTI ABDULLAH v MUHAMMAD NAIM BIN GHULAM MUHAMMAD is a High Court decision dated June 25, 2025. The case was heard by Jamhirah binti Ali. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (12)

UK (2)

[1963] 2 All ER 151 [1963] 3 All ER 952

MY (10)

[1972] 1 MLJ 45 [1973] 2 MLJ 56 [1985] 1 MLJ 334 [1989] 1 CLJ 152 [1989] 1 MLJ 315 [1996] 1 MLJ 393 [1999] 1 MLJ 371 [2005] 2 MLJ 1 [2019] 3 MLJ 720 [2020] 12 MLJ 67

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-12b-97-09-2024)