1. ) HO THAM MOI 2. ) LEE HONG KEOW v TAY YU YAA

ba-12bcy-1-01-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 28 September 2025 • BA-12BCY-1-01/2025 • 9 min read

13 cases cited (0 SG, 13 foreign)

Catchwords

CIVIL PROCEDURE — Appeal — Interference by appellate court — Whether appellate court should be slow to interfere — Trial judge had the benefit of assessing the evidence

Practice Areas

CIVIL PROCEDURE

Judges (1)

Anita binti Harun Delivered

Counsel (4)

Foo Hiap Siong & Co Firm SS Ng & Lim Firm Aw Shi Qin Counsel Respondent Tan Jun Sheng Counsel Appellant

Parties (3)

Ho Tham Moi Appellant Lee Hong Keow Appellant Tay Yu Yaa Respondent

Case Significance

1. ) HO THAM MOI 2. ) LEE HONG KEOW v TAY YU YAA is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 28, 2025 (citation: ba-12bcy-1-01-2025). The case was decided by Anita binti Harun.

Key issues: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Appeal — Interference by appellate court — Whether appellate court should be slow to interfere — Trial judge had the benefit of assessing the evidence.

What was the outcome of 1. ) HO THAM MOI 2. ) LEE HONG KEOW v TAY YU YAA?

1. ) HO THAM MOI 2. ) LEE HONG KEOW v TAY YU YAA is a High Court decision dated September 28, 2025. The case was heard by Anita binti Harun. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (13)

UK (2)

[1944] AC 116 [1971] 1 WLR 1239

MY (11)

[1972] 1 MLJ 45 [1989] 1 MLJ 315 [1996] 3 CLJ 590 [2003] 2 CLJ 19 [2004] 5 CLJ 46 [2005] 2 MLJ 1 [2010] 7 CLJ 885 [2010] 9 CLJ 785 [2011] 7 CLJ 498 [2012] 6 CLJ 573 [2015] 7 CLJ 180

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-12bcy-1-01-2025)