THT TECHNOLOGY SDN BHD v PLASMA MATRIK SDN BHD

ba-12bncc-9-05-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 5 February 2026 • BA-12BNCC-9-05/2025 • 27 min read
6 cases cited (0 SG, 6 foreign)

Catchwords

The Plaintiff, Plasma Matrik Sdn Bhd, appealed against the High Court’s decision allowing the Defendant’s appeal, setting aside the Sessions Court judgment, and dismissing its claim for RM615,872.40. The Plaintiff has further appealed to the Court of Appeal. The claim concerned unpaid goods allegedly supplied between 2016 and 2018, which the Defendant denied receiving. The central issue was whether delivery and receipt of the goods were proven on a balance of probabilities. Upon re-evaluating the evidence, the Court found that the Plaintiff failed to discharge this burden. Documentary evidence was unreliable, and witness admissions undermined the claim. Consequently, the Sessions Court decision was unsafe, and the Plaintiff’s claim was rightly dismissed.

Judges (1)

Anita binti Harun Delivered

Counsel (5)

Alan Kang & Co. Firm Othman Hashim & Co Firm Alan Kang Wei Luen Counsel Appellant Emily Chong Pei Yen Counsel Respondent Lee Peggie Counsel Appellant

Parties (2)

PLASMA MATRIK Sdn Bhd Respondent THT TECHNOLOGY Sdn Bhd Appellant

Statutes Cited

Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)
s 114(g)

Cases Cited (6)

MY (6)
[1979] 2 MLJ 229 [2005] 2 MLJ 1 [2009] 6 MLJ 293 [2014] 4 MLJ 147 [2021] 7 MLJ 1699 [2025] 4 MLJ 420

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-12bncc-9-05-2025)