Ramesh Sivaraj A/l Rajasingham Chelliah v Sithamparanathan a/l Nadarajah

ba-12bncvc-21-06-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 5 January 2025 • BA-12BNCvC-21-06/2023 • 11 min read

3 cases cited (0 SG, 3 foreign)

Catchwords

Appeal after full trial – Claim for repayment of friendly loan – Friendly loan agreement – Remittances of Funds - Pleaded defence inconsistent with evidence adduced at the trial - Authenticity of the Agreement - Allegation of forged signature – Burden of proof - Onus of proof on Defendant to prove that the signature is forged - Sections 45, 67, 73, 101, 102, 103 of the Evidence Act 1950

Judges (1)

Elaine Yap Chin Gaik Delivered

Counsel (5)

M Scully Firm The Law Chambers of Vasanthi Ramadass Firm Maurice Ernest Scully Counsel Appellant Sreekanth Pillai Counsel Respondent Vasanthi A/P Ramadass Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

Ramesh Sivaraj a/l Rajasingham Chelliah Appellant Sithamparanathan a/l Nadarajah Respondent

Case Significance

Ramesh Sivaraj A/l Rajasingham Chelliah v Sithamparanathan a/l Nadarajah is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 5, 2025 (citation: ba-12bncvc-21-06-2023). The case was decided by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik.

What was the outcome of Ramesh Sivaraj A/l Rajasingham Chelliah v Sithamparanathan a/l Nadarajah?

Ramesh Sivaraj A/l Rajasingham Chelliah v Sithamparanathan a/l Nadarajah is a High Court decision dated January 5, 2025. The case was heard by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (3)

MY (3)

[1980] 2 MLJ 86 [2005] 1 MLJ 712 [2010] 9 MLJ 224

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-12bncvc-21-06-2023)