SCENIC FAREAST SDN BHD v BIFORST LOGISTICS SDN BHD

ba-12bncvc-41-10-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 5 February 2025 • BA-12BNCvC-41-10/2023 • 5 min read

2 cases cited (0 SG, 2 foreign)

Catchwords

Civil appeal after full trial – Issue on reinstatement costs – Whether there is an agreement by estoppel - Expert opinion report not tendered pursuant to Order 40A Rule 3 of the Rules of Court 2012 - What was reasonably reflective of the true reinstatement costs - Relative cogency of available evidence - Balance of probabilities

Judges (1)

Elaine Yap Chin Gaik Delivered

Counsel (5)

Alwin Rajasurya Firm Jehan & Co Firm Faradilla Jehan Kadar Counsel Appellant Mohd Saiful Hadi Counsel Appellant Yong Shu Xhuan Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

BIFORST LOGISTICS Sdn Bhd Respondent SCENIC FAREAST Sdn Bhd Appellant

Case Significance

SCENIC FAREAST SDN BHD v BIFORST LOGISTICS SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated February 5, 2025 (citation: ba-12bncvc-41-10-2023). The case was decided by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik.

What was the outcome of SCENIC FAREAST SDN BHD v BIFORST LOGISTICS SDN BHD?

SCENIC FAREAST SDN BHD v BIFORST LOGISTICS SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated February 5, 2025. The case was heard by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (2)

MY (2)

[2019] MLJU 495 [2022] 4 CLJ 833

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-12bncvc-41-10-2023)