1. ) DR. MUHAMMAD ILHAM BIN KHALIT 2. ) KHALIT BIN PIT 3. ) HALIMAH BINTI HASAN v UNIVERSITI SELANGOR (UNISEL)

ba-12bncvc-83-12-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 21 October 2025 • BA-12BNCvC-83-12/2024 • 21 min read
7 cases cited (0 SG, 7 foreign)

Catchwords

Appeal against Sessions Court judgment after trial – Sessions Court allowed respondent’s claim for appellant’s breach of contract of a study leave agreement – Whether appellant is obliged to serve respondent during a specified bond period – Whether appellant is required to pay liquidated damages for breach of the bond in the event of his resignation within a particular period – Section 5 of the Contracts (Amendment) Act 1976 – Contra proferentem rule.

Judges (1)

Quay Chew Soon Delivered

Counsel (4)

Ammar & Co. Firm Ibrahim & Fuaadah Firm Meor Amir bin Meor Omar Counsel Appellant Mohamed Ibrahim bin K P Kunji Mohamad Counsel Respondent

Parties (4)

UNIVERSITI SELANGOR Respondent Dr. Muhammad Ilham bin Khalit Appellant Halimah binti Hasan Appellant Khalit bin Pit Appellant

Case Significance

1. ) DR. MUHAMMAD ILHAM BIN KHALIT 2. ) KHALIT BIN PIT 3. ) HALIMAH BINTI HAS... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 21, 2025 (citation: ba-12bncvc-83-12-2024). The case was decided by Quay Chew Soon.

What was the outcome of 1. ) DR. MUHAMMAD ILHAM BIN KHALIT 2. ) KHALIT BIN PIT 3. ) HALIMAH BINTI HAS...?

1. ) DR. MUHAMMAD ILHAM BIN KHALIT 2. ) KHALIT BIN PIT 3. ) HALIMAH BINTI HAS... is a High Court decision dated October 21, 2025. The case was heard by Quay Chew Soon. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Contract Act 1950
s 74
Contracts Act 1950 (Cap 136)
s 10 s 38
Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (7)

MY (7)
[1982] 1 MLJ 184 [1982] CLJ 107 [1984] 2 MLJ 165 [2010] 9 CLJ 785 [2012] 6 MLJ 1 [2015] MLJU 1282 [2020] 12 MLJ 67

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-12bncvc-83-12-2024)