SENA TRAFFIC SYSTEMS SDN. BHD. v 1. ) AR-RIFQI SDN. BHD. 2. ) ZAIMIL AZHAR BIN ZAINAL 3. ) ITMAX SYSTEMS SDN BHD 4. ) Tan Sri Tan Boon Hock 5. ) Sharifah Maizura Binti Syed Mohamad Rithuan 6. ) RONY ZHANG 7. ) ZHANG ZIYANG 8. ) SENA TRAFFIC SYSTEM SDN BHD

ba-22ncc-118-06-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 25 November 2025 • BA-22NCC-118-06/2025 • 9 min read
6 cases cited (0 SG, 6 foreign)

Catchwords

Civil Procedure — Summary judgment — Commercial debt — Supply of telecommunications equipment — Unpaid invoices — Clear documentary evidence — Purchase orders, delivery orders and invoices — Defence alleging coercion and additional agreement — No contemporaneous protest or supporting documents — Bare assertions — Afterthought — No bona fide triable issue — Summary judgment allowed — Rules of Court 2012, O.14 Contract — Guarantee — Letter of guarantee — Personal liability of guarantor — Guarantor admitting signature — Defence of misunderstanding and failure to read document — No fraud, misrepresentation or duress — Party bound by document signed — No triable issue — Summary judgment against guarantor — L’Estrange v Graucob applied Civil Procedure — Pleadings — Counterclaim — Striking out — Allegation of commercial conspiracy — Failure to plead essential elements — No agreement, no common design, no overt acts, no particulars of damage — Pleadings vague and speculative — No reasonable cause of action — Frivolous and vexatious — Abuse of process — Counterclaim struck out — Rules of Court 2012, O.18 r.19 Company Law — Separate legal personality — Third parties — Alleged conspirators not party to contract or alleged additional agreement — No factual nexus pleaded — Improper joinder — Counterclaim unsustainable Evidence — Burden of proof — Allegations of coercion and conspiracy — Absence of contemporaneous documents — No protest, complaint or corroborative evidence — Allegations rejected Practice and Procedure — Consolidated determination — Summary judgment and striking-out applications — Efficient disposal — Counterclaim dismissed consequent upon summary judgment

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Asmah binti Musa Delivered

Counsel (5)

Amar Syiimir Izzat & Sham Firm PC Choong & Company Firm Eugene K.Y Choong Counsel Plaintiff Kho Yan Yee Counsel Plaintiff Muhammad Nor Izzat Nordin Counsel Defendant

Parties (9)

AR-RIFQI Sdn Bhd Defendant ITMAX SYSTEMS Sdn Bhd Defendant SENA TRAFFIC SYSTEM Sdn Bhd Defendant SENA TRAFFIC SYSTEMS Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Rony Zhang Defendant Sharifah Maizura binti Syed Mohamad Rithuan Defendant Tan Sri Tan Boon Hock Defendant Zaimil Azhar bin Zainal Defendant Zhang Ziyang Defendant

Case Significance

SENA TRAFFIC SYSTEMS SDN. BHD. v 1. ) AR-RIFQI SDN. BHD. 2. ) ZAIMIL AZHAR BI... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated November 25, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncc-118-06-2025). The case was decided by Asmah binti Musa.

What was the outcome of SENA TRAFFIC SYSTEMS SDN. BHD. v 1. ) AR-RIFQI SDN. BHD. 2. ) ZAIMIL AZHAR BI...?

SENA TRAFFIC SYSTEMS SDN. BHD. v 1. ) AR-RIFQI SDN. BHD. 2. ) ZAIMIL AZHAR BI... is a High Court decision dated November 25, 2025. The case was heard by Asmah binti Musa. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (6)

UK (1)
[1934] 2 KB 394
MY (5)
[1992] 1 MLJ 400 [2012] 7 MLJ 754 [2012] 7 MLJ 840 [2015] 6 MLJ 810 [2025] 6 MLJ 106

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-22ncc-118-06-2025)