Siemens Malaysia Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Pestech Energy Sdn Bhd 2. ) Pestech International Berhad

ba-22ncc-152-08-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 28 April 2025 • BA-22NCC-152-08/2024 • 17 min read

12 cases cited (0 SG, 12 foreign)

Catchwords

TATACARA SIVIL: Penghakiman terus di bawah Aturan 14 Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 – Sama ada baki bayaran tertunggak bagi “goods and services rendered” berjaya dibuktikan? – Sama ada keterangan afidavit yang dikemukakan oleh kedua-dua pihak adalah mencukupi untuk Mahkamah memutuskan suatu penghakiman muktamad? – Sama ada isu yang dibangkitkan oleh Defendan-Defendan perlu diadakan dengan cara mendengar keterangan saksi?

Judges (1)

Rozi binti Bainon Delivered

Counsel (6)

Aarthi & Associates Firm Christopher Lee & Ong Firm Aarthi Jeyarajah Counsel Defendant Ong Wei Ying Counsel Plaintiff S. Kumutha Counsel Defendant Sivaram Prasad Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (3)

PESTECH INTERNATIONAL BERHAD Defendant Pestech Energy Sdn Bhd Defendant Siemens Malaysia Sdn Bhd Plaintiff

Case Significance

Siemens Malaysia Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Pestech Energy Sdn Bhd 2. ) Pestech Internati... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated April 28, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncc-152-08-2024). The case was decided by Rozi binti Bainon.

What was the outcome of Siemens Malaysia Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Pestech Energy Sdn Bhd 2. ) Pestech Internati...?

Siemens Malaysia Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Pestech Energy Sdn Bhd 2. ) Pestech Internati... is a High Court decision dated April 28, 2025. The case was heard by Rozi binti Bainon. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (12)

MY (12)

[1975] 1 MLJ 85 [1981] 1 MLJ 282 [1984] 2 MLJ 300 [1990] 3 MLJ 1 [1992] 1 MLJ 400 [1996] 1 MLJ 309 [1998] 1 AMR 657 [1998] 1 CLJ 1045 [2004] 1 CLJ 232 [2008] 1 MLJ 585 [2010] 3 CLJ 332 [2021] 1 CLJ 313

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-22ncc-152-08-2024)