Loo An Swee v 1. ) Pang Kim Chon 2. ) Loo Bon Lan

ba-22ncc-64-06-2021 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 27 January 2025 • BA-22NCC-64-06/2021 • 27 min read
5 cases cited (0 SG, 5 foreign)

Catchwords

Civil Trial: The plaintiff's claims against the defendants involve RM835,000.00, alleged as a friendly loan. The defendants acknowledge receiving it but deny that it was a loan. They assert that RM835,000.00 was a brokerage fee owed to the 1st defendant and have filed a counterclaim for RM3,765,000.00 against the plaintiff. Contract: Whether there is a friendly loan contract between the plaintiff and the 1st defendant - Whether the RM835,000.00 given by the plaintiff to the defendants constitutes a friendly loan - Whether the sum of RM835,000.00 given by the plaintiff to the defendants is part of brokerage fees for services rendered by the 1st defendant to the plaintiff at the plaintiff’s request - Whether the first defendant is entitled to RM4,600,000.00 as the brokerage fee for selling EQSB’s shares. Evidence: Section 101 and 102 of the Evidence Act 1950.

Judges (1)

Hazizah binti Kassim Delivered

Counsel (6)

Kek Ooi & Lee Hong Firm The Law Office of Wong & Ang Firm Chin Yin Choi Counsel Plaintiff Kek Boon Wei Counsel Defendant Kirubakaran Karthigasu Counsel Defendant Lee Wen Qian Counsel Defendant

Parties (3)

Loo An Swee Plaintiff Loo Bon Lan Defendant Pang Kim Chon Defendant

Case Significance

Loo An Swee v 1. ) Pang Kim Chon 2. ) Loo Bon Lan is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 27, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncc-64-06-2021). The case was decided by Hazizah binti Kassim.

What was the outcome of Loo An Swee v 1. ) Pang Kim Chon 2. ) Loo Bon Lan?

Loo An Swee v 1. ) Pang Kim Chon 2. ) Loo Bon Lan is a High Court decision dated January 27, 2025. The case was heard by Hazizah binti Kassim. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Contract Act 1950
s 71
Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)

Cases Cited (5)

MY (5)
[1988] 2 MLRH 707 [1989] 2 MLJ 253 [2007] 6 MLJ 97 [2014] 2 CLJ 15 [2017] 6 MLJ 54

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-22ncc-64-06-2021)