MELBOURNE SUNRISE SDN BHD v HOW NAM HUI PENCELAH CHONG VOON KEONG

ba-22ncvc-103-03-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 9 November 2025 • BA-22NCvC-103-03/2025 • 5 min read
1 cases cited (0 SG, 1 foreign)

Catchwords

Enclosure 10 is an application by the Plaintiff to strike out the Defendant’s counterclaim pursuant to Order 18 rule 19(1)(a), (b) and (d) of the Rules of Court 2012 (ROC). Defendant’s counterclaim discloses no reasonable cause of action and is legally unsustainable. Enclosure 10 is allowed with costs. The Defendant’s counterclaim is hereby struck out.

Judges (1)

Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat Delivered

Counsel (5)

Armiy Rais Firm Azam-Malek & Soh Firm Eng Yi Wang Counsel Defendant Muhammad Al-Hazim bin Idris Counsel Plaintiff Ong Swee Long Counsel Defendant

Parties (3)

MELBOURNE SUNRISE Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Chong Voon Keong Intervener How Nam Hui Defendant

Case Significance

MELBOURNE SUNRISE SDN BHD v HOW NAM HUI PENCELAH CHONG VOON KEONG is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated November 9, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncvc-103-03-2025). The case was decided by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat.

What was the outcome of MELBOURNE SUNRISE SDN BHD v HOW NAM HUI PENCELAH CHONG VOON KEONG?

MELBOURNE SUNRISE SDN BHD v HOW NAM HUI PENCELAH CHONG VOON KEONG is a High Court decision dated November 9, 2025. The case was heard by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (1)

MY (1)
[2024] 6 CLJ 487

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-22ncvc-103-03-2025)