1. ) SYMPHONY ORIC DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD 2. ) Chin Jit Pyng v 1. ) OPEN ROAD ASIA SDN BHD 2. ) GOH POO ENG 3. ) ROSLIZAN BIN NEKMAT
ba-22ncvc-124-03-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 13 July 2025 • BA-22NCvC-124-03/2023 • 8 min read
Catchwords
WRIT: Tuntutan plaintif terhadap defendan-defendan akibat kemungkiran Perjanjian Pembangunan Bersama bertarikh 28.4.2021 – Semasa tarikh perbicaraan penuh, wakil plaintif memohon penangguhan untuk melantik peguam cara baharu setelah peguam cara plaintif menarik diri – Mahkamah menolak permohonan penangguhan oleh wakil plaintif dan defendan memohon tuntutan plaintif ditolak – Mahkamah tidak menolak tuntutan plaintif sebaliknya telah membatalkan Writ Saman dan Pernyataan Tuntutan dan meneruskan dengan kes defendan-defendan bagi Tuntutan Balas. TATACARA SIVIL: Sama ada Mahkamah mempunyai kuasa budibicara untuk membatalkan tuntutan plaintif – Mahkamah perlu memberi pertimbangan kepada keadilan – Aturan 35 Kaedah 1 (1) dan (2) dan Aturan 1A Kaedah-kaedah Mahkamah 2012.
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Case Significance
1. ) SYMPHONY ORIC DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD 2. ) Chin Jit Pyng v 1. ) OPEN ROAD AS... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated July 13, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncvc-124-03-2023). The case was decided by Hazizah binti Kassim.
What was the outcome of 1. ) SYMPHONY ORIC DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD 2. ) Chin Jit Pyng v 1. ) OPEN ROAD AS...?
1. ) SYMPHONY ORIC DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD 2. ) Chin Jit Pyng v 1. ) OPEN ROAD AS... is a High Court decision dated July 13, 2025. The case was heard by Hazizah binti Kassim. See the full judgment for details.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (ba-22ncvc-124-03-2023)