FARINA BINTI FARIKHULLAH KHAN v NASUTION BIN MOHAMED

ba-22ncvc-142-04-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 29 July 2025 • BA-22NCvC-142-04/2024 • 27 min read
8 cases cited (0 SG, 8 foreign)

Catchwords

TATACARA SIVIL: Permohonan Interlokutori – Notis permohonan oleh Plaintif menurut A. 18 k. 19(1) untuk membatalkan perenggan-perenggan tertentu dalam pembelaan terpinda − Permohonan Defendan untuk membatalkan keseluruhan tuntutan Plaintif atas isu Mahkamah Tinggi Sivil tiada bidangkuasa untuk mendengar tuntutan ini telahpun ditolak oleh Mahkamah ini − Defendan sekali lagi memasukkan hal perkara mengenai “tuntutan Plaintif perlu diadili di Mahkamah Tinggi Shariah dan bukannya Mahkamah Tinggi Sivil kerana Mahkamah Tinggi Sivil tiada bidangkuasa untuk mendengar tuntutan ini” − kes Hartecon JV Sdn Bhd & Anor v Hartela Contractors Ltd [1997] 2 CLJ 104.

Judges (1)

Rozi binti Bainon Delivered

Counsel (5)

Akberdin & Co Firm M David Morais Firm Akberdin B Hj Abdul Kader Counsel Plaintiff Faradinah binti Abu Bakar Counsel Plaintiff Pavitra Pillai A/P Ramesh Pillai Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

Farina binti Farikhullah Khan Plaintiff Nasution bin Mohamed Defendant

Case Significance

FARINA BINTI FARIKHULLAH KHAN v NASUTION BIN MOHAMED is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated July 29, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncvc-142-04-2024). The case was decided by Rozi binti Bainon.

What was the outcome of FARINA BINTI FARIKHULLAH KHAN v NASUTION BIN MOHAMED?

FARINA BINTI FARIKHULLAH KHAN v NASUTION BIN MOHAMED is a High Court decision dated July 29, 2025. The case was heard by Rozi binti Bainon. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Federal Constitution

Cases Cited (8)

MY (8)
[1988] 1 MLJ 291 [1993] 3 MLJ 36 [1997] 2 CLJ 104 [2007] 5 CLJ 253 [2012] 7 CLJ 845 [2018] 4 MLJ 496 [2019] MLJU 742 [2020] 2 AMR 517

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-22ncvc-142-04-2024)