Mokkaya A/p Selembaram v THIEVEANTHIRAN A/L THURAISAMY

ba-22ncvc-158-04-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 25 September 2025 • BA-22NCvC-158-04/2025 • 12 min read

9 cases cited (0 SG, 9 foreign)

Catchwords

TATACARA SIVIL: Perintah Injunksi Interim − Pendengaran secara inter parte − Sama ada permohonan pengetepian dan/atau pembatalan Perintah Interim Injunksi boleh dibenarkan? − Prinsip undang-undang yang terpakai − Sama ada ganti rugi adalah mencukupi tanpa Perintah Injunksi Interim? Sama ada imbangan kesenangan berpihak kepada Defendan? − Sama ada terdapat isu bona fide untuk dibicarakan? − Afidavit semasa permohonan ex parte akan dinilai semula oleh Mahkamah.

Judges (1)

Rozi binti Bainon Delivered

Counsel (5)

Krishnasamy Bhakta & Associates Firm Nagarajan Peri & Co. Firm Krishnasamy Bhaktavatsalu Counsel Plaintiff Nagarajan A/L Periasamy Counsel Defendant Vinoshni A/P Narayanasamy Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

Mokkaya a/p Selembaram Plaintiff Thieveanthiran a/l Thuraisamy Defendant

Case Significance

Mokkaya A/p Selembaram v THIEVEANTHIRAN A/L THURAISAMY is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 25, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncvc-158-04-2025). The case was decided by Rozi binti Bainon.

What was the outcome of Mokkaya A/p Selembaram v THIEVEANTHIRAN A/L THURAISAMY?

Mokkaya A/p Selembaram v THIEVEANTHIRAN A/L THURAISAMY is a High Court decision dated September 25, 2025. The case was heard by Rozi binti Bainon. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (9)

UK (1)

[1975] 1 All ER 504

MY (8)

[1995] 1 CLJ 293 [1995] 1 MLJ 193 [1995] 1 MLJ 214 [1995] 1 MLJ 241 [2007] 5 MLJ 593 [2011] MLJU 1482 [2017] MLJU 508 [2023] MLJU 2000

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-22ncvc-158-04-2025)