FELIX RELOCATIONS (M) SDN BHD v 1. ) IVS ITECHNICS (M) SDN BHD 2. ) DATO' VICNESVARAN a/l RAJAMANIKKAN 3. ) DATIN GIRIJA a/p SUBRAMANIAM

ba-22ncvc-159-04-2021 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 14 August 2025 • BA-22NCvC-159-04/2021 • 15 min read

2 cases cited (0 SG, 2 foreign)

Catchwords

This is a civil action arising from a transaction between parties who were, at the material time, “friends” and business acquaintances. What began as a relationship of trust later turned sour, giving rise to this dispute. The Plaintiff has proven, on a balance of probabilities, that the sum of RM2,000,000.00 advanced to the Defendants was a friendly loan and not an investment. The Plaintiff’s claim is allowed

Judges (1)

Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat Delivered

Counsel (6)

Aravind Atifah & Rajvin Firm Jasbeer, Nur & Lee Firm Aravind Raj a/l T Paramasivam Counsel Defendant Atifah Muhammad Counsel Defendant Jasbeer Singh Kaura Counsel Plaintiff Jeyshini Naidu a/p G. Kali Das Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (4)

FELIX RELOCATIONS Sdn Bhd Plaintiff IVS ITECHNICS Sdn Bhd Defendant Datin Girija a/p Subramaniam Defendant Dato' Vicnesvaran a/l Rajamanikkan Defendant

Case Significance

FELIX RELOCATIONS (M) SDN BHD v 1. ) IVS ITECHNICS (M) SDN BHD 2. ) DATO' VIC... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated August 14, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncvc-159-04-2021). The case was decided by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat.

What was the outcome of FELIX RELOCATIONS (M) SDN BHD v 1. ) IVS ITECHNICS (M) SDN BHD 2. ) DATO' VIC...?

FELIX RELOCATIONS (M) SDN BHD v 1. ) IVS ITECHNICS (M) SDN BHD 2. ) DATO' VIC... is a High Court decision dated August 14, 2025. The case was heard by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (2)

MY (2)

[1980] 2 MLJ 16 [2010] 7 MLJ 488

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-22ncvc-159-04-2021)