LAN ING HOCK @ LAU ING HOCK v TOH CHING KING
Catchwords
EVIDENCE: Admissibility of documents – Onus of proof lies on one who asserts forgery and fabrication – Production of original document – Exception to hearsay under Section 32 and 73A of the Evidence Act 1950 LAND: Ownership of land – Sale of land vide oral agreement – Hearsay – Absence of direct evidence – Circumstantial evidence – No adverse possession under section 341 of the National Land Code 1965 – Allegation that the Power of Attorney represented as an instrument to transfer the land – Possession of the title extracts – Inconsistent accounts of the hearsay – Neither party proved their proprietary rights to the land CIVIL PROCEDURE: Impugned judgment – Impeachment – Jurisdiction – High Court – Whether one High Court has jurisdiction to set aside a final order of another High Court – Locus standi to set aside the impugned judgment – Proof of fraud - Derry v Peek misrepresentations
Judges (1)
Case Significance
LAN ING HOCK @ LAU ING HOCK v TOH CHING KING is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 21, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncvc-247-06-2023). The case was decided by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik.
What was the outcome of LAN ING HOCK @ LAU ING HOCK v TOH CHING KING?
LAN ING HOCK @ LAU ING HOCK v TOH CHING KING is a High Court decision dated September 21, 2025. The case was heard by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik. See the full judgment for details.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (ba-22ncvc-247-06-2023)