RCBUMINIAGA SDN BHD v SAWIT KINABALU SDN BHD

ba-22ncvc-285-08-2020 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 17 April 2025 • BA-22NCvC-285-08/2020 • 22 min read

Catchwords

Civil Justice - claim for breach of contract - evidence reveals wrong party sued - the principle of separate legal entity not adhered to - pleaded case lack particularity - sum claimed not particularized - terms of contract including offer and absolute acceptance not pleaded - claim not proven - claim dismissed with costs - as existence of contract not established - counterclaim falls and also dismissed with costs.

Judges (1)

Muniandy a/l Kannyappan Delivered

Counsel (4)

S Murthi & Associates Firm Surendran & Thiru Firm S. Murthi Counsel Defendant Thiru Mangai Krishnan Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

RCBUMINIAGA Sdn Bhd Plaintiff SAWIT KINABALU Sdn Bhd Defendant

Case Significance

RCBUMINIAGA SDN BHD v SAWIT KINABALU SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated April 17, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncvc-285-08-2020). The case was decided by Muniandy a/l Kannyappan.

What was the outcome of RCBUMINIAGA SDN BHD v SAWIT KINABALU SDN BHD?

RCBUMINIAGA SDN BHD v SAWIT KINABALU SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated April 17, 2025. The case was heard by Muniandy a/l Kannyappan. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Contracts Act 1950 (Cap 136)

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-22ncvc-285-08-2020)