Mentari Business Park JMB v mentari properties sdn bhd

ba-22ncvc-354-06-2016 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 12 August 2025 • BA-22NCVC-354-06/2016 • 6 min read

Catchwords

Damages – Assessment of damages – High Court’s judgment was affirmed by Court of Appeal and remitted for assessment – Dispute relating to ownership of carpark lots – Assessment of electricity charges/bills – Differing tabulations of bills between parties – Damages assessed must be actual damages – The credibility/weight of expert affidavits in assessing damages – Whether six years limitation period applies at the assessment of damages stage – Section 6(1) of the Limitation Act 1953 – Order 37 of the Rules of Court 2012

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Elaine Yap Chin Gaik Delivered

Counsel (5)

Dorairaj, Low & Teh Firm Yoon & Partners Firm Annette Rachel Edwin Counsel Defendant Muhammad Khairuddin bin Annuar Counsel Plaintiff Nathelyn Pereira Counsel Defendant

Parties (3)

mentari properties Sdn Bhd Defendant Mentari Business Park Jmb Plaintiff Xxxx Defendant

Case Significance

Mentari Business Park JMB v XXXX is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated August 12, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncvc-354-06-2016). The case was decided by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik.

What was the outcome of Mentari Business Park JMB v XXXX?

Mentari Business Park JMB v XXXX is a High Court decision dated August 12, 2025. The case was heard by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Limitation Act 1953 (Cap 254)

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-22ncvc-354-06-2016)