Jamaludin Bin Mohamad v 1. ) Ezme Bin Md Radzi 2. ) Tetuan Rosenida, Azlina, Hafidz & Co

ba-22ncvc-451-10-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 18 January 2026 • BA-22NCvC-451-10/2025 • 14 min read

19 cases cited (0 SG, 19 foreign)

Catchwords

KEYWORD - CIVIL PROCEDURE- Order 18 Rule 19(1)(b), (c) or (d)- Order 92 Rule 4 of the Rules of Court 2012-Section 346 of the Companies Act 2016- majority shareholders can bring oppression claims- premature judicial intervention in matters- short‑cut mechanisms without adequate pleaded justification- scandalous, frivolous, vexatious or an abuse of process - Court’s duty to prevent multiplicity and collateral litigation- two cases involving the same parties, issues, and facts filed.

Judges (1)

Shoba Rajah a/p Dorai Rajah Delivered

Counsel (4)

Marshita Surin & Assoc. Firm Rosenida Azlina Hafidz & Co. Firm Mohammed Hafidz Bin Ghozali Counsel Defendant Surinjit Kaur A/P Garkar Singh Counsel Defendant

Parties (3)

Tetuan Rosenida, Azlina, Hafidz & Co Defendant Ezme bin Md Radzi Defendant Jamaludin bin Mohamad Plaintiff

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (19)

UK (1)

[1930] 1 KB 628

MY (18)

[1956] MLJ 45 [1964] MLJ 99 [1971] 2 MLJ 214 [1974] MLJ 157 [1986] 1 MLJ 490 [1989] 3 MLJ 313 [1991] 1 MLJ 428 [1992] 2 MLJ 46 [1993] 1 MLJ 306 [1993] 3 MLJ 16 [1993] 3 MLJ 36 [1995] 3 MLJ 189 [1996] 3 MLJ 259 [2011] 5 MLJ 219 [2012] MLJ 56 [2013] 3 MLJ 235 [2015] MLJU 519 [2021] MLJU 2938

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-22ncvc-451-10-2025)