SHANGHAI YUANYI TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD v 1. ) SYAHAZLIN HERRYTHA BINTI ZULKEPLI 2. ) VINOD SHARMA A/L BALBIR SINGH 3. ) VINOD SHARMA LAW FIRM 4. ) MOHD KHAIRIL NIZAM BIN MOHD K JABAYEE

ba-22ncvc-467-11-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 1 September 2025 • BA-22NCvC-467-11/2024 • 9 min read

Catchwords

Enclosure 32 is the 2nd and 3rd Defendant’s (D2 and D3) application to expunge/strike out Plaintiff’s affidavits in reply (enclosures 26 and 30) to D2 and D3’s Notice of Applications for security for cost (enclosure 7) and application under O14A (enclosure 20). Enclosure 32 is dismissed with costs.

Judges (1)

Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat Delivered

Counsel (4)

Chang Chooi & Co. Firm Vinod Sharma Law Firm Firm Megan Choo Wen Shin Counsel Plaintiff Vinod Sharma A/L Balbir Singh Counsel Defendant

Parties (5)

SHANGHAI YUANYI TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD Plaintiff Mohd Khairil Nizam bin Mohd K Jabayee Defendant Syahazlin Herrytha binti Zulkepli Defendant Vinod Sharma Law Firm Defendant Vinod Sharma a/l Balbir Singh Defendant

Case Significance

SHANGHAI YUANYI TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD v 1. ) SYAHAZLIN HERRYTHA BINTI ZULKEPLI 2... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 1, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncvc-467-11-2024). The case was decided by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat.

What was the outcome of SHANGHAI YUANYI TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD v 1. ) SYAHAZLIN HERRYTHA BINTI ZULKEPLI 2...?

SHANGHAI YUANYI TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD v 1. ) SYAHAZLIN HERRYTHA BINTI ZULKEPLI 2... is a High Court decision dated September 1, 2025. The case was heard by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-22ncvc-467-11-2024)