Bimach Powerhouse Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Lee Chung Hoong 2. ) Wong Mooi Kiew

ba-22ncvc-469-11-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 16 March 2026 • BA-22NCvC-469-11/2022 • 27 min read

11 cases cited (0 SG, 11 foreign)

Catchwords

These two actions were heard together. The first action is BA-22NCvC-219-05/2024 ("Suit 219"). It was originally commenced in the Bangi Sessions Court (BI-A52-7-12/2021) and later transferred to this Court. The second action is BA-22NCvC-469-11/2022 ("Suit 469"). The parties agreed, and the Court directed that both actions be heard together. Having considered the pleadings, the evidence, the documentary exhibits, and the submissions of the parties, I find that Wong has established her claim in Suit 219. As for Suit 469, Bimach has failed to prove its claim against Wong and Lee Chung Hoong. I also dismiss Wong and Lee Chung Hoong's counterclaim, as the evidence does not establish abuse of process.

Judges (1)

Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat Delivered

Counsel (5)

Armiy Rais Firm Marcus Tan & Co. Firm Ong Swee Long Counsel Defendant Phang Weng Lam Counsel Plaintiff Teo Chung Loong Counsel Defendant

Parties (3)

BIMACH POWERHOUSE Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Lee Chung Hoong Defendant Wong Mooi Kiew Defendant

Statutes Cited

Bills of Exchange Act 1949

s 2 s 47

Contracts Act 1950 (Cap 136)

s 73

Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)

Cases Cited (11)

MY (11)

[1963] 29 MLJ 6 [1991] 1 MLJ 428 [1991] 3 MLJ 187 [1995] 3 MLJ 331 [2012] 2 MLJ 289 [2012] MLJU 1815 [2015] 5 MLJ 437 [2019] MLJ 631 [2020] MLJU 1054 [2021] MLJU 2336 [2022] 6 MLJ 810

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-22ncvc-469-11-2022)