1. ) LEE SUIT YIN 2. ) SRITHARAN NAIDU A/L SUNDARA RAJOO v HONG LEONG BANK BERHAD

ba-22ncvc-485-11-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 22 June 2025 • BA-22NCvC-485-11/2024 • 13 min read

Catchwords

The Defendant filed two applications via Enclosure 24, for summary judgment of the counterclaim to be recorded pursuant to O14 Rule 5 of the Rules of Court 2012 (ROC) and Enclosure 26, to strike out the Plaintiffs’ claim in accordance with Order 18 Rule 19 of the ROC. Both applications were allowed with a cost of RM5000 each to the Defendant, subject to the allocator. Plaintiff’s claim is struck out, and the Defendant’s counterclaim is summarily recorded as prayed for.

Judges (1)

Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat Delivered

Counsel (5)

Thomas Leong & Associates Firm Lee Boon Keat Counsel Defendant Shamalah Selvarajah Counsel Defendant Thomas Ong Kian Sun Counsel Defendant Vanusya Joothymani Counsel Defendant

Parties (3)

HONG LEONG BANK BERHAD Defendant Lee Suit Yin Plaintiff Sritharan Naidu a/l Sundara Rajoo Plaintiff

Case Significance

1. ) LEE SUIT YIN 2. ) SRITHARAN NAIDU A/L SUNDARA RAJOO v HONG LEONG BANK BE... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 22, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncvc-485-11-2024). The case was decided by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat.

What was the outcome of 1. ) LEE SUIT YIN 2. ) SRITHARAN NAIDU A/L SUNDARA RAJOO v HONG LEONG BANK BE...?

1. ) LEE SUIT YIN 2. ) SRITHARAN NAIDU A/L SUNDARA RAJOO v HONG LEONG BANK BE... is a High Court decision dated June 22, 2025. The case was heard by Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-22ncvc-485-11-2024)