1. ) PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN THE USJ 19 CITY MALL 2. ) PALAZZO EMPIRE SDN BHD v 1. ) TIOW WENG THEONG 2. ) RAVANDIRAN A/L RAMAN KUTTY 3. ) CHONG WENG HONG 4. ) POTENSI TERUS INDUSTRIES SDN BHD
ba-22ncvc-506-12-2020 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 20 August 2025 • BA-22NCvC-506-12/2020 • 20 min read
4 cases cited
(0 SG, 4 foreign)
Catchwords
Judges (1)
Counsel (9)
Lui & Bhullar Firm Mastura Partnership Firm The Law Office of Patrick Samuel Firm Chandni Anantha Krishanan Counsel Defendant Goh Wan Ping Counsel Plaintiff Harneshpal Singh Bhullar Counsel Defendant Patrick Samuel Sebastian Counsel Defendant Sivabalan Karupiah Counsel Plaintiff Sophia Au May San Counsel Defendant
Case Significance
1. ) PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN THE USJ 19 CITY MALL 2. ) PALAZZO EMPIRE SDN BHD v... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated August 20, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncvc-506-12-2020). The case was decided by Indra Nehru Savandiah.
Key issues: Section 21 SMA 2013, Section 21 SMA 2013, whether committee member of JMB can hold office de facto - misappropriation of funds - SMA, social legislation..
What was the outcome of 1. ) PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN THE USJ 19 CITY MALL 2. ) PALAZZO EMPIRE SDN BHD v...?
1. ) PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN THE USJ 19 CITY MALL 2. ) PALAZZO EMPIRE SDN BHD v... is a High Court decision dated August 20, 2025. The case was heard by Indra Nehru Savandiah. See the full judgment for details.
Statutes Cited
Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)
Cases Cited (4)
MY (4)
[2011] 3 CLJ 837 [2017] 10 CLJ 580 [2020] 10 CLJ 285 [2025] 5 CLJ 20
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (ba-22ncvc-506-12-2020)