HEIWA SANGYO SDN BHD v 1. ) SUBRAMANIAM A/L MUNISAMY 2. ) MOHD BAHAROM BIN SAID 3. ) MUHD LUQMAN NULHAKIM BIN MOHD ZULKAPLI 4. ) INDKOM HOLDINGS SDN BHD

ba-22ncvc-506-12-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 10 August 2025 • BA-22NCvC-506-12/2023 • 23 min read
3 cases cited (0 SG, 3 foreign)

Catchwords

UNDANG-UNDANG TORT: Pencerobohan dan kacau-ganggu di premois sewaan Plaintif − Berdasarkan keterangan saksi-saksi Plaintif dan rakaman video CCTV, Plaintif berjaya membuktikan kausa tindakan terhadap Defendan-Defendan − Kuantum ganti rugi bagi tort pencerobohan Premis tersebut boleh dinilai dan tidak perlu dibuat taksiran ganti rugi dan juga jumlah kerugian yang telah dialami oleh Plaintif dapat dipertimbangkan secara terus − Elemen penting dalam menentukan bahawa Defendan-Defendan melakukan pencerobohan dan kacau-ganggu adalah pemilikan adalah tidak tepat − Plaintif tidak melanggar perjanjian sewaan, dsb.

Judges (1)

Rozi binti Bainon Delivered

Counsel (6)

J.S. Pillay & Mohd Haaziq Firm Win & Men Dy Firm Amirul Naim Ghazali Counsel Defendant Edwin Lim Counsel Plaintiff Leong Mendy Counsel Plaintiff Nurul Faqirah Mohd Faidzal Counsel Defendant

Parties (5)

HEIWA SANGYO Sdn Bhd Plaintiff INDKOM HOLDINGS Sdn Bhd Defendant Mohd Baharom bin Said Defendant Muhd Luqman Nulhakim bin Mohd Zulkapli Defendant Subramaniam a/l Munisamy Defendant

Case Significance

HEIWA SANGYO SDN BHD v 1. ) SUBRAMANIAM A/L MUNISAMY 2. ) MOHD BAHAROM BIN SA... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated August 10, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncvc-506-12-2023). The case was decided by Rozi binti Bainon.

What was the outcome of HEIWA SANGYO SDN BHD v 1. ) SUBRAMANIAM A/L MUNISAMY 2. ) MOHD BAHAROM BIN SA...?

HEIWA SANGYO SDN BHD v 1. ) SUBRAMANIAM A/L MUNISAMY 2. ) MOHD BAHAROM BIN SA... is a High Court decision dated August 10, 2025. The case was heard by Rozi binti Bainon. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)

Cases Cited (3)

UK (1)
[1964] 1 All ER 367
MY (2)
[2018] 1 MLJ 784 [2023] MLJU 1006

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-22ncvc-506-12-2023)