1. ) P. KALIVANN A/L PALANIVELU 2. ) MALA A/P KASINATHAN v 1. ) FROGGER CREATION SDN BHD 2. ) YAP CHEE KONG 3. ) YUE KAH LAI 4. ) CHEN YIN CHOY
ba-23ncvc-67-12-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 1 August 2025 • BA-23NCvC-67-12/2024 • 10 min read
20 cases cited
(0 SG, 20 foreign)
Catchwords
The Plaintiffs were introduced to the First Defendant company through the Fourth Defendant. Following that introduction, the Plaintiffs entered into an agreement with the First Defendant for renovation works to be carried out at their residence. Dissatisfied with the manner and outcome of the said works, the Plaintiffs commenced an action against the First Defendant, its directors, that is, the Second and Third Defendants and the Fourth Defendant. The present Notices of Application, found in Enclosures 17 and 21, are brought by the Fourth Defendant and the Second and Third Defendants respectively, seeking to strike out the Plaintiffs’ claim against them. The central issue in both these Notices of Application is whether this is a proper case for the Plaintiffs’ claim to be struck out pursuant to Order 18 rule 19(1) of the Rules of Court 2012.
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Statutes Cited
Rules of Court 2012
Cases Cited (20)
UK (2)
[1990] 2 AC 605 [2009] EWCA Civ 169
MY (18)
[2007] 6 MLRH 444 [2008] 2 AMR 336 [2008] 2 CLJ 660 [2008] 4 MLJ 914 [2010] 4 MLJ 541 [2015] 4 MLJ 734 [2015] 5 AMR 185 [2015] 7 CLJ 1008 [2016] 2 AMR 795 [2016] 3 CLJ 1 [2016] 3 MLJ 1 [2018] AMEJ 0959 [2021] AMEJ 1873 [2021] MLJU 2422 [2024] AMEJ 1100 [2024] AMEJ 1807 [2024] MLJU 1036 [2024] MLJU 1948
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (ba-23ncvc-67-12-2024)