Vistamore Sdn Bhd v Geostrength Engineering Sdn Bhd
11 cases cited
(0 SG, 11 foreign)
Catchwords
Construction Law – Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (CIPAA) – Adjudication – Setting aside – Enforcement Adjudication Decision – Application to set aside under s.15(b) & s.15(d) CIPAA – Alleged denial of natural justice – Alleged excess of jurisdiction – Whether adjudicator relied on matters outside Payment Claim – Whether reliance on parties’ conduct and practice amounts to jurisdictional error – Distinction between jurisdictional error and error within jurisdiction Natural Justice – Requirement of material prejudice – Whether interpretation of Letter of Undertaking and application of s.35 CIPAA constituted breach of natural justice Jurisdiction – Scope of adjudicator’s jurisdiction under s.27 CIPAA – Whether adjudicator exceeded jurisdiction by considering conduct and practice – Whether adjudicator determined dispute beyond matters referred Enforcement – Application under s.28 CIPAA – Whether adjudication decision enforceable as judgment – Preconditions for enforcement – Effect of unsuccessful setting aside application
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Cases Cited (11)
UK (3)
[2008] EWHC 2015 [2008] EWHC 282 [2009] EWHC 2218
MY (8)
[2015] 11 MLJ 499 [2015] MLJU 1873 [2015] MLJU 941 [2016] MLJU 1776 [2017] MLJU 242 [2018] MLJU 1542 [2019] 1 CLJ 592 [2020] 7 MLJ 482
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (ba-24c-46-07-2025)