NAZRIN SHAHNAZ BINTI PEER MOHAMED v SLOB SDN BHD
7 cases cited
(0 SG, 7 foreign)
Catchwords
This action originated from an Adjudication Decision (AD) made by the appointed adjudicator. The AD was in favour of the Plaintiff as the sub-contractor against the main contractor. Since the main contractor did not pay the adjudication amount to the Plaintiff in accordance to the AD, the Plaintiff made a written request to the Defendant, being the principal to the main contractor for direct payment to be made pursuant to Section 30 of the Construction Industry Payment Adjudication Act 2012 (CIPAA 2012).
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Case Significance
NAZRIN SHAHNAZ BINTI PEER MOHAMED v SLOB SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated July 28, 2025 (citation: ba-24c-55-12-2024). The case was decided by Sumathi a/p Murugiah.
Key issues: This action originated from an Adjudication Decision (AD) made by the appointed adjudicator. The AD was in favour of the Plaintiff as the sub-contractor against the main contractor..
What was the outcome of NAZRIN SHAHNAZ BINTI PEER MOHAMED v SLOB SDN BHD?
NAZRIN SHAHNAZ BINTI PEER MOHAMED v SLOB SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated July 28, 2025. The case was heard by Sumathi a/p Murugiah. See the full judgment for details.
Statutes Cited
Rules of Court 2012
Cases Cited (7)
MY (7)
[1941] MLJ 103 [1981] 1 MLJ 143 [1994] 1 MLJ 312 [2002] 3 CLJ 108 [2013] 6 AMR 33 [2013] 6 MLJ 765 [2023] MLJU 1652
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (ba-24c-55-12-2024)