TEE KENG EING v 1. ) FAMILY OPTOMETRY SDN BHD 2. ) YONG YIT TUNG

ba-24ncc-127-10-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 27 April 2025 • BA-24NCC-127-10/2024 • 13 min read

6 cases cited (1 SG, 5 foreign)

Catchwords

COMPANY LAW: Derivative action - Action on behalf of company - Application for leave – Requirement of the 30 days’ written notice of intention to apply for leave - Whether the purported notice is a valid and adequate notice under section 348(2) of the Companies Act 2016 - Whether application for leave made in good faith - Whether it appears prima facie to be in the best interest of company for leave of court to be granted

Judges (1)

Elaine Yap Chin Gaik Delivered

Counsel (4)

Goh Chin Han Firm YW Tan & Co. Firm Goh Chin Han Counsel Defendant Tan Yong Wei Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (3)

FAMILY OPTOMETRY Sdn Bhd Respondent Tee Keng Eing Applicant Yong Yit Tung Respondent

Case Significance

TEE KENG EING v 1. ) FAMILY OPTOMETRY SDN BHD 2. ) YONG YIT TUNG is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated April 27, 2025 (citation: ba-24ncc-127-10-2024). The case was decided by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik.

What was the outcome of TEE KENG EING v 1. ) FAMILY OPTOMETRY SDN BHD 2. ) YONG YIT TUNG?

TEE KENG EING v 1. ) FAMILY OPTOMETRY SDN BHD 2. ) YONG YIT TUNG is a High Court decision dated April 27, 2025. The case was heard by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Companies Act 2016

s 347

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (6)

SLR (1)

[2004] 3 SLR 1

MY (5)

[2010] 7 CLJ 808 [2016] 6 MLJ 449 [2018] 5 CLJ 706 [2019] 7 CLJ 807 [2024] 4 CLJ 499

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-24ncc-127-10-2024)