1. ) RATIGA A/P MARKANDAN 2. ) DEVI A/P APPARORAN @ APPARAO 3. ) ANNAKAHMU A/P PERIASAMY 4. ) MOHAMAD BIN KHAMIS v 1. ) RADHA KRISHNAN A/L VENGADASAN 2. ) EMILIA BINTI BASRI 3. ) MANDUCEKAP HI-TEC SDN BHD

ba-24ncc-148-12-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 24 March 2026 • BA-24NCC-148-12/2025 • 17 min read

9 cases cited (0 SG, 9 foreign)

Catchwords

Companies – members’ rights to requisition an extraordinary general meeting (“EGM”) under Sections 311 and 310(b) of the Companies Act 2016 (“CA 2016”) — whether Section 310(b) of CA 2016 applies only to a single member holding 10% of the shares, or also to multiple members with a combined shareholding of 10% – whether the singular noun ‘member’ in Section 310(b) of CA 2016 includes ‘members’ — Section 4(3) of the Interpretation Act 1948 and 1967 — and whether the quia timet injunction became academic after the EGM was convened.

Judges (1)

Helmi bin Hamzah Delivered

Counsel (10)

G. Ragumaren & Co Firm Justin Voon Chooi & Wing Firm Malek, Gan & Partners Firm Alex De Silva Counsel Defendant Erica Sree Counsel Defendant G.Ragumaren Counsel Defendant Justin Voon Tiam Yu Counsel Plaintiff Nadesh Ganabaskaran Counsel Defendant Sevina Daphine Sebatian Counsel Defendant Tan Ko Xin Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (7)

MANDUCEKAP HI-TEC Sdn Bhd Respondent Annakahmu a/p Periasamy Applicant Devi a/p Apparoran @ Apparao Applicant Emilia binti Basri Respondent Mohamad bin Khamis Applicant Radha Krishnan a/l Vengadasan Respondent Ratiga a/p Markandan Applicant

Cases Cited (9)

MY (9)

[1990] 1 MLJ 436 [2007] 6 MLJ 677 [2008] 4 CLJ 893 [2013] 1 MLJ 461 [2016] 7 MLJ 445 [2018] 10 CLJ 517 [2018] MLJU 213 [2021] 7 MLJ 852 [2022] MLJU 424

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-24ncc-148-12-2025)