SHELL MALAYSIA TRADING SDN BHD v Hasdiana Binti Hashim

ba-24ncc-15-02-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 27 March 2025 • BA-24NCC-15-02/2025 • 11 min read

1 cases cited (0 SG, 1 foreign)

Catchwords

Arbitration - Contemplated arbitration proceedings - Injunctive reliefs - Interim measures by High Court - Applicable test - Whether and the extent to which an applicant must show a serious issue to be tried – Whether the Defendant’s arguments are within the purview of arbitration - Sections 11 and 19J of the Arbitration Act 2005

Practice Areas

Arbitration

Judges (1)

Elaine Yap Chin Gaik Delivered

Counsel (6)

Ramesh Dipendra Jeremiah Law Firm Shri & Partners Firm HR Dipendra Counsel Plaintiff Hoo Kit Yee Counsel Plaintiff Mishant Thiruchelvam Counsel Defendant Thanashri K Suppaya Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

SHELL MALAYSIA TRADING Sdn Bhd Applicant Hasdiana binti Hashim Respondent

Case Significance

SHELL MALAYSIA TRADING SDN BHD v Hasdiana Binti Hashim is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 27, 2025 (citation: ba-24ncc-15-02-2025). The case was decided by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik.

What was the outcome of SHELL MALAYSIA TRADING SDN BHD v Hasdiana Binti Hashim?

SHELL MALAYSIA TRADING SDN BHD v Hasdiana Binti Hashim is a High Court decision dated March 27, 2025. The case was heard by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (1)

MY (1)

[2022] 8 CLJ 671

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-24ncc-15-02-2025)