PERUSAHAAN OTOMOBIL NASIONAL SDN BHD v VICTORIOUS STEP SDN BHD

ba-24ncc-82-08-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 16 October 2025 • BA-24NCC-82-08/2025 • 26 min read
13 cases cited (0 SG, 13 foreign)

Catchwords

UNDANG-UNDANG SYARIKAT: Fortuna Injunction & Penggulungan syarikat Plaintif − Hutang Yang Dipertikaikan − Sama ada hutang yang dituntut itu masih dalam pertikaian dan pertikaian itu adalah bona fide? − Prinsip undang-undang yang membenarkan Fortuna Injunction − Sama ada Notis Tuntutan Berkanun adalah cara yang terbaik? − Sama ada Defendan dapat membuktikan bahawa Plaintiif tidak berkeupayaan membayar hutang (“unable to pay debts”)? − Companies Act 2016, s. 465 & 466

Judges (1)

Rozi binti Bainon Delivered

Counsel (6)

Qutra & Co. Firm Rahmat Lim & Partners Firm Nur Hidayah binti Azmal @ Azman Counsel Defendant Pua Jing Man Counsel Defendant Tan Chuan Yi Counsel Plaintiff Yap Yeow Han Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

PERUSAHAAN OTOMOBIL NASIONAL Sdn Bhd Applicant VICTORIOUS STEP Sdn Bhd Respondent

Case Significance

PERUSAHAAN OTOMOBIL NASIONAL SDN BHD v VICTORIOUS STEP SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 16, 2025 (citation: ba-24ncc-82-08-2025). The case was decided by Rozi binti Bainon.

What was the outcome of PERUSAHAAN OTOMOBIL NASIONAL SDN BHD v VICTORIOUS STEP SDN BHD?

PERUSAHAAN OTOMOBIL NASIONAL SDN BHD v VICTORIOUS STEP SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated October 16, 2025. The case was heard by Rozi binti Bainon. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)
s 466
Road Transport Act 1987 (Cap 333)

Cases Cited (13)

MY (13)
[1990] 1 MLJ 21 [1997] 1 CLJ 147 [2001] 1 CLJ 591 [2001] 1 MLJ 356 [2004] 1 MLJ 545 [2007] 3 CLJ 295 [2007] 3 MLJ 316 [2008] 3 CLJ 215 [2010] MLJU 2217 [2011] 1 CLJ 947 [2012] 6 MLJ 817 [2019] 3 CLJ 499 [2024] 6 CLJ 149

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-24ncc-82-08-2025)