VIMALA A/P MARUTHAMUTHOO v PAUL MONASH A/L NARAYANASAMY PENCELAH KAVITAH A/P VATHUMALAI

ba-24ncvc-1077-05-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 4 December 2024 • BA-24NCvC-1077-05/2024 • 9 min read

4 cases cited (0 SG, 4 foreign)

Catchwords

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Parties-Plaintiff’s application to remove private caveat lodged by defendant- Proposed intervener filed application to intervene-Locus standi-Intervention-When leave granted-Principle-Whether intervener had legal interest directly affected by these proceedings and not mere financial or commercial interest-Whether findings of court in proceedings would directly affect intervener-Rules of Court 2012, O.15 r.6 (2)(b)

Judges (1)

Jamhirah binti Ali Delivered

Counsel (4)

J.J. Naidu Dan Rakan-Rakan Firm L H Yeo & Co. Firm Etrus Tan Counsel Plaintiff J.J. Naidu Counsel Defendant

Parties (3)

Kavitah a/p Vathumalai Intervener Paul Monash a/l Narayanasamy Respondent Vimala a/p Maruthamuthoo Applicant

Statutes Cited

National Land Code (Cap 828)

Cases Cited (4)

MY (4)

[1995] 1 MLJ 719 [1997] 2 MLJ 487 [2005] 6 MLJ 454 [2008] 2 MLJ 273

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-24ncvc-1077-05-2024)