Nena Suraya binti Abdullah v Daud bin Hj Othman

ba-24ncvc-1530-07-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 12 February 2025 • BA-24NCvC-1530-07/2024 • 14 min read
11 cases cited (0 SG, 11 foreign)

Catchwords

SAMAN PEMULA: Kaveat persendirian dimasukkan oleh defendan – Plaintif memohon menyingkirkan kaveat persendirian untuk membolehkan hartanah dijual oleh plaintif – Defendan memfailkan tuntutan harta sepencarian semasa poligami – Sama ada defendan mempunyai kepentingan yang boleh dikaveatkan – Sama ada defendan mempunyai persoalan bermerit yang wajar dibicarakan - Sama ada pemfailan tuntutan harta sepencarian merupakan fikiran terkemudian. KANUN TANAH NEGARA: Kaveat persendirian - Penyingkiran kaveat persendirian – s. 323 dan 327 Kanun Tanah Negara

Judges (1)

Hazizah binti Kassim Delivered

Counsel (5)

Hanif Hassan & Co. Firm Mohamed Noor, Amran & Yoon Firm Ardeliza Izmaryanti Shafie Counsel Defendant Khairul Aiman Counsel Plaintiff Roslan Hadri Zulkifli Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

Daud bin Hj Othman Respondent Nena Suraya binti Abdullah Applicant

Case Significance

Nena Suraya binti Abdullah v Daud bin Hj Othman is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated February 12, 2025 (citation: ba-24ncvc-1530-07-2024). The case was decided by Hazizah binti Kassim.

Key issues: KANUN TANAH NEGARA: Kaveat persendirian - Penyingkiran kaveat persendirian – s. 323 dan 327 Kanun Tanah Negara.

What was the outcome of Nena Suraya binti Abdullah v Daud bin Hj Othman?

Nena Suraya binti Abdullah v Daud bin Hj Othman is a High Court decision dated February 12, 2025. The case was heard by Hazizah binti Kassim. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (11)

MY (11)
[1951] MLJ 209 [1970] 1 MLJ 145 [1974] 2 MLJ 199 [1976] 2 MLJ 44 [1979] 2 MLJ 212 [1994] 2 MLJ 614 [1995] 1 MLJ 719 [1995] 3 CLJ 520 [2000] MLJU 78 [2012] 6 MLJ 475 [2012] 7 CLJ 802

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-24ncvc-1530-07-2024)